The literature on feminism and multiculturalism has identified potential conflicts between the recognition of cultural diversity and securing women's equality. Three broad approaches to this dilemma have emerged in the practices of contemporary states: regulation, working with the communities, and exit. Each of these is apparent in current initiatives regarding forced marriage, but the overwhelming emphasis in the UK has been on enabling individuals to exit from the threat or reality of a forced marriage. In assessing these initiatives, we highlight the limitations of exit and the danger of moving towards immigration regulation as the preferred solution We wish to thank the Nuffield Foundation for funding the research on which this paper is based. Thanks also to the many individuals who agreed to be interviewed for the research; and to participants at the Gender and Cultural Diversity conference, LSE October 2003, for their comments on an earlier draft. While the multicultural nature of European societies is increasingly acknowledged, the policy implications are more contested. When cultural diversity is ignored or denied, there is a danger that public policy will write in the practices and assumptions of majority groups as unquestioned norms. Members of minority groups may then find themselves less protected than others in their cultural or religious practices; they may even be coerced into replicating majority behaviour in order to conform with the law. But moving from an arrogant assimilationism to a hands-off toleration also carries risks, and especially so when what is represented as the 'tradition' of a minority cultural group turns out to bear more heavily on some members than others.As a growing feminist literature on multiculturalism argues (e.g. Okin, 1998;Shachar, 2001), this is particularly likely to happen when the traditions in question order the relationship of women to men or young people to old. In such circumstances, a 'live and let live' approach to cultural difference can undermine the rights of young people and women.In the theoretical literature and practices of contemporary states, three broad solutions have emerged; we roughly categorise these as regulation, dialogue and exit.