2009
DOI: 10.3140/bull.geosci.1126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

South American Ordovician phyllocarids (Crustacea, Malacostraca)

Abstract: A detailed morphological analysis of exoskeleton remains of the South American Ordovician phyllocarid crustaceans leads to the recognition of a previously unexpected biodiversity from the Tremadocian up to the Katian. As a result, the genus <i>Caryocaris</i>, as up to now understood, clearly appears to be a comprehensive genus. Taxonomically significant characters are listed and discussed. Two new caryocaridid genera are described: <i>Janviericaris </i>gen. nov., and <i>Ivocaris &… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rolfecaris lethiersi was tentatively placed within Ceratiocarididae due to several inconsistencies with the diagnosis of this family, including the more-oval general outline, the apparent lack of a rostral plate, and a lack of a carapace horn. It was noted by Racheboeuf et al (2009) that the ornament was quite similar to that of Gonatocaris but that R. lethiersi lacked large ('optic') tubercles. The lack of tubercles is not necessarily problematic for placement within Gonaticaris; significant evidence exists within thin-shelled taxa (notably Ceratiocaris) to suggest that the 'optic tubercle' is likely an artefact of a relatively thin, pliable cuticle draping over a more robustly mineralized mandibular process (Rolfe, 1962;Collette and Rudkin, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rolfecaris lethiersi was tentatively placed within Ceratiocarididae due to several inconsistencies with the diagnosis of this family, including the more-oval general outline, the apparent lack of a rostral plate, and a lack of a carapace horn. It was noted by Racheboeuf et al (2009) that the ornament was quite similar to that of Gonatocaris but that R. lethiersi lacked large ('optic') tubercles. The lack of tubercles is not necessarily problematic for placement within Gonaticaris; significant evidence exists within thin-shelled taxa (notably Ceratiocaris) to suggest that the 'optic tubercle' is likely an artefact of a relatively thin, pliable cuticle draping over a more robustly mineralized mandibular process (Rolfe, 1962;Collette and Rudkin, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taphonomic history of the Winneshiek SCFs that allowed their preservation with finest details may have been similar to that of crustacean remains from the Cambrian of Canada reported from the Mount Cap Formation (lower Cambrian), the Deadwood Formation (middle-upper Cambrian), the Earlie Formation (middle Cambrian) and the Nolichucky Shale (middle-upper Cambrian) (Harvey & Butterfield 2008;Harvey et al 2012a,b;Harvey & Pedder 2013). The fossil record of crustaceans in the Ordovician is largely represented by easily preserved ostracod shells and phyllocarid carapaces (Sepkoski 2000;Vannier et al 2003;Racheboeuf et al 2009;Perrier et al 2015). Exceptionally preserved specimens from Konservat-Lagerst€ atten can contribute enormously to fill some gaps in the fossil record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of the Ordovician genera Pumilocaris Racheboeuf et al ., and Rolfecaris Racheboeuf et al ., have different carapace shapes and body proportions, respectively (see Racheboeuf et al . ).…”
Section: Taxonomic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of the Ordovician genera Pumilocaris Racheboeuf et al ., and Rolfecaris Racheboeuf et al ., have different carapace shapes and body proportions, respectively (see Racheboeuf et al . ). Species of Emmelezoe Jones, clearly differ in their greatly elongated pleomeres and distinct carapace ornamentation (see Collette & Hagadorn ).…”
Section: Taxonomic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%