Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1976
DOI: 10.24033/asens.1307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sous-monoïdes d'intersection complète de $N$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
112
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We need an extension to the equivariant reducible case of the theory of numerical semigroups and monomial curves developed by Delorme, Herzog, Kunz, Watanabe and the authors [4,9,10,21,28]. The necessary parts of this theory are developed in Sections 3-7.…”
Section: Our Main Results Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need an extension to the equivariant reducible case of the theory of numerical semigroups and monomial curves developed by Delorme, Herzog, Kunz, Watanabe and the authors [4,9,10,21,28]. The necessary parts of this theory are developed in Sections 3-7.…”
Section: Our Main Results Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The translations of the above coordinates in terms of numerical semigroups are { 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 33 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 34, 23 , 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 , 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 43 , 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 31, 44 , 12, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23, 26, 28, 31, 32, 34, 49 }. Now, by solving problem (SC m (D)), 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,34, 23 is discarded. Then, the decomposition using our methodology is given by five 12-irreducible numerical semigroups: S = 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 33 ∩ 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ∩ 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 43 ∩ 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 31, 44 ∩ 12, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23, 26, 28, 32, 34 . However, this decomposition is not minimal since S = 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 39 ∩ 12, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 43 ∩ 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 31, 44 ∩ 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 49 is a decomposition into mirreducible numerical semigroups using a smaller number of terms.…”
Section: Lemma 26 Let Y Be An Optimal Solution Of (Ip M (X H)) Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the simplest numerical semigroup is Z + . Numerical semigroups were first considered while studying the set of nonnegative solutions of Diophantine equations and their investigation is closely related to the analysis of monomial curves (see [20]). Because of these connections with algebraic geometry, some terminology has been exported to the theory of numerical semigroups, for instance, the multiplicity, the genus, or the embedding dimension of a numerical semigroup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction it is worth highlighting [Ramírez Alfonsín 2000;≥ 2005], where a review of this problem is given, with many references. In the literature one can also find a large number of publications devoted to the study of one-dimensional analytically irreducible local domains via their value semigroups, which are numerical semigroups; see, for instance, [Apéry 1946;Barucci et al 1997;Bertin and Carbonne 1977;Delorme 1976;Fröberg et al 1987;Kunz 1970;Teissier 1973;Watanabe 1973]. As a consequence of this study, some interesting kinds of numerical semigroups arise, such as symmetric and pseudo-symmetric numerical semigroups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%