Sourcing Competition under Cost Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry

Abstract

Driven by increasing costs in the traditionally regarded low‐cost manufacturing bases (e.g., China), many firms have started to outsource their production to the regions of even lower costs (e.g., Southeast Asia). However, a new environment may involve higher cost uncertainty and severer information asymmetry. Motivated by these observations, we consider a sourcing game where competing firms choose between a supplier with transparent certain cost (type‐C supplier) and a supplier with potentially lower but less transparent, uncertain cost (type‐U supplier). We characterize the equilibrium of the sourcing game and study how different parameters affect the firms’ sourcing strategy and profit performance. First, we find that due to information asymmetry, a large market size can make firms prefer the C‐supplier to the U‐supplier even if the latter has a lower average cost. Second, reducing the cost uncertainty or improving the signal accuracy of the U‐supplier does not necessarily make it more attractive to sourcing firms, which cautions the suppliers when making efforts to mitigate cost uncertainty or improve cost estimation. Third, higher competition intensity makes the diversified sourcing strategy more likely to be adopted under certain conditions. Interestingly, increasing the cost of the C‐supplier (e.g., a cost hike in China) may make both sourcing firms better off because it can lead to a new sourcing equilibrium. Finally, this study shows that the direction of quantity distortion under the optimal competitive mechanism differs from that under the traditional monopolistic setting.

Pricing and Quantity Decisions under Asymmetric Carbon Emission Reduction Information and Cap-and-Trade Mechanism

“…Previous scholars discuss a variety of information asymmetry, mainly including widespread asymmetric information and distinctive asymmetric information. Widespread asymmetric information has attracted much attention in the field of supply chain management, such as demand information [31][32][33][34], cost information [35][36][37], quality information [3,38,39], and so on. It is also so abundant in the green supply chain.…”

Bunkering and information decisions in the sea cargo service industry based on uncertain spot price

“…When important market information is unique to one party in the supply chain, the other party can induce the disclosure of this information by means of contractual incentives. This involves studies on asymmetric information, such as those by Song et al (2017), Piccolo et al (2018), Shao et al (2020), Yang et al (2020), Cao and Chen (2021), Li et al (2022), Sun et al (2022). When relevant uncertainty is faced by all members of the supply chain, obtaining information and further updating cognition become important measures to reduce the uncertainty risk.…”

Blockchain’s role in e-commerce sellers’ decision-making on information disclosure under competition

“…His biggest innovation is that manufacturers and retailers can choose not only the price level, but also the pricing timing. In the aspect of output competition, Shao et al ( 2020 ) considered a purchasing game with opaque cost, described the equilibrium of purchasing game, and studied the influence of different parameters on purchasing strategies and profit performance. Han & Liu ( 2020 ) established an optimization model of high-quality product supply chain, in which many competing companies adopt the strategy of vertical integration and must determine the quality level of production and the quantity of production at each level.…”