1997
DOI: 10.2307/4089068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Variation in Waterfowl Survival Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study area, unsuccessful females were not more likely to change nesting areas in subsequent years, possibly because a generally high hatching success and high breeding density made such effects difficult to detect. The average annual survival rate estimated for female Goldeneyes was 0.830 (se = ±0.023), which is high compared with other duck species (Blums et al 1996, Krementz et al 1997a. One possible reason is that this population experiences no hunting pressure in Germany and only rarely migrates into countries with an open season for Common Goldeneye (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study area, unsuccessful females were not more likely to change nesting areas in subsequent years, possibly because a generally high hatching success and high breeding density made such effects difficult to detect. The average annual survival rate estimated for female Goldeneyes was 0.830 (se = ±0.023), which is high compared with other duck species (Blums et al 1996, Krementz et al 1997a. One possible reason is that this population experiences no hunting pressure in Germany and only rarely migrates into countries with an open season for Common Goldeneye (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The average annual survival rate estimated for female Goldeneyes was 0.830 (se = ±0.023), which is high compared with other duck species (Blums et al . 1996, Krementz et al . 1997a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed species-specific survival probabilities in both analyses. Krementz et al (1997) reported higher survival for female ducks in the tribe Mergini than ducks in the tribes Aythyini and Anatini, and also observed a positive relationship between annual survival probability and body mass among species. They suggested that body mass and tribe were related to differences in life-history strategies among the species in their analysis.…”
Section: Species-specific Variationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our data did not span the range of species, body masses, or years considered by Krementz et al (1997), and we were unable to make extensive within-tribe comparisons. Perhaps the individuals in this study were influenced by regional and temporal patterns of hunting and nonhunting mortality or environmental conditions Table 3.…”
Section: Species-specific Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…null) survival model and additive and interaction models incorporating year (YEAR), female age (AGE), and regression residuals of body mass at capture on the date of capture (MASS). We included AGE and MASS in the first step of model selection because these covariates often influence individual survival of waterfowl in winter (Conroy et al 1989, Krementz et al 1997. We also included YEAR in the first step because of the interaction that we found between body mass residuals and year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%