2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-017-2686-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Variability and Lower Values in Toughness Measurements of Weld Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the different number of passes, the proportion of reheated weld metal at the Charpy-V notch position was similar for both welds. The parameters used in welding procedures, mainly the number of passes and the deposition sequence, exert an important effect on weld metal recrystallization and consequently on their mechanical properties [5,11,[21][22][23]. In the present work, a similar proportion of reheated regions enabled comparison of the weld metal properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the different number of passes, the proportion of reheated weld metal at the Charpy-V notch position was similar for both welds. The parameters used in welding procedures, mainly the number of passes and the deposition sequence, exert an important effect on weld metal recrystallization and consequently on their mechanical properties [5,11,[21][22][23]. In the present work, a similar proportion of reheated regions enabled comparison of the weld metal properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…From Equation (1), it is obvious that D has a significant influence on the fracture stress ( σ f(f) ). Also, it is important to note that brittle secondary phase particles such as carbides, or defects deteriorate the fracture plastic strain ε pc [18] and, as a result, deteriorate the fracture toughness remarkably. Those two parameters, the grain size and brittle structure, play an essential role in explaining the variations in the impact results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coarse grains) because σ f(f) is lower at the coarser grain compared with the surrounding relative finer grains. Also, the hard structure of the fracture origins of both RJ1 and RJ2 facilitated fracture since deterioration of ε pc due to carbides and hard phases makes crack nucleation easier [18]. RJ2 depicted the lowest impact results (69 J) due to the combined action of both WM coarse grain size, confirmed by microstructure in Figure 5(e) and the fractured surface in Figure 13(a), and the hard structure created by carbon migration in the vicinity of the FL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify the relationship between impact toughness and fracture surface, four parameters of the fracture surface are defined in Refs. [33,34]. These parameters are the stretch zone width (SZW), fibrous crack length (SCL), the distance from the crack initiation site to the fibrous crack (x f ), and the distance from the crack initiation location to the original notch root (X f ).…”
Section: Fracture Surface Of the Impact Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%