2016
DOI: 10.3354/meps11722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of sediment carbon sequestered in restored seagrass meadows

Abstract: Seagrass meadows accumulate carbon in sediments as a result of in situ production and sedimentation of particulate organic matter (OM). We quantified the contribution of OM sources to the sediment carbon pool in restored seagrass meadows of different ages (unvegetated and 4 and 10 yr since restoration) in the Virginia coastal bays. Using carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stable isotopes, we estimated the contribution of seagrass (Zostera marina), benthic diatoms and sestonic particles (BD/S), and macroalgae (MA) to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). These findings align with other studies that have found largely allochthonous contributions to seagrass sediment OC stocks, with 50% or more of the carbon originating from non‐seagrass sources such as macroalgae, salt marsh vegetation, benthic microalgae, plankton, or terrestrial sources (Kennedy et al ; Miyajima et al ; Greiner et al ; Oreska et al ). While the isotope sources used here are distinct from one another, overlapping source signatures can make it challenging to decipher relative contributions to the sediments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…). These findings align with other studies that have found largely allochthonous contributions to seagrass sediment OC stocks, with 50% or more of the carbon originating from non‐seagrass sources such as macroalgae, salt marsh vegetation, benthic microalgae, plankton, or terrestrial sources (Kennedy et al ; Miyajima et al ; Greiner et al ; Oreska et al ). While the isotope sources used here are distinct from one another, overlapping source signatures can make it challenging to decipher relative contributions to the sediments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, in their recent blue carbon review, Macreadie et al () only discuss microalgal carbon in the context of a regime shift from marsh or seagrass to microalgal production that results in less blue carbon storage—not coupling between these macrophytes and BMA that may increase BMA productivity and, therefore, SOC accumulation. By analyzing SOC at the meadow‐scale, our results confirm initial suggestions by Greiner et al () that BMA represents the dominant contributor to the SOC stock in this particular seagrass meadow. BMA production—not allochthonous POM trapping—likely accounts for much of the non‐seagrass SOC observed in seagrass meadows (Kennedy et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The Zostera marina (eelgrass) meadow in South Bay, Virginia, U.S.A., is part of the Virginia Coast Reserve Long-Term Ecological Research (VCR-LTER) eelgrass restoration and represents the single largest, successfully restored seagrass meadow to date (Orth et al 2006Orth and McGlathery 2012). SOC profile comparisons confirm that this meadow now stores significantly more SOC than adjacent bare sites Greiner et al 2013) and that much of this SOC is non-seagrass in origin (Greiner et al 2016). However, the SOC is nonuniformly distributed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greiner et al [44] found that only half of the sediment C org at an interior site in the South Bay meadow derived from vascular plants. The C:N ratio in the C org hotspot in the southeast part of the meadow (Fig 4) conforms more closely to the range observed for seston and macroalgae than for Z .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%