2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of particle number concentration and noise near London Gatwick Airport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(90 reference statements)
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that in the area of 520 m north and south of the runway extension, the airport contributes about as much to PNC as busy roads. This is consistent with the results of Tremper et al (2022), who found a similarly high PNC near Gatwick Airport as in close proximity to heavily trafficked roads. The large impact of road traffic on PNC found in our study may also be due in part to a larger proportion of diesel vehicles in the fleet compared to study areas in the United States such as those of Hudda et al (2014) or Shirmohammadi et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We find that in the area of 520 m north and south of the runway extension, the airport contributes about as much to PNC as busy roads. This is consistent with the results of Tremper et al (2022), who found a similarly high PNC near Gatwick Airport as in close proximity to heavily trafficked roads. The large impact of road traffic on PNC found in our study may also be due in part to a larger proportion of diesel vehicles in the fleet compared to study areas in the United States such as those of Hudda et al (2014) or Shirmohammadi et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are comparable to Masiol et al (2017), who calculated a 30% contribution of London Heathrow (LHR) airport to total PNC in the vicinity. The observed contribution of the airport to total PNC is higher at LHR and TXL than for London Gatwick Airport (17%) (Tremper et al, 2022) or Venice airport (20%) (Masiol et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast, during the ongoing operation of an airport, it is possible, for example, to assign particles or emissions to an airport by including different particle sizes (Masiol et al, 2016;Psanis et al, 2017), other air quality parameters like black carbon (Keuken et al, 2012;Austin et al, 2021) or chemical analyses of the collected particles (Ungeheuer et al, 2021). The impact of an airport on PNCs can furthermore be contrasted from other UFP sources statistically, by including regression analyses (i.e., Hsu et al, 2012;Fritz et al, 2022), k-means clustering or positive matrix factorisation (PMF) (Masiol et al, 2017;Tremper et al, 2022) and principal component analyses (Austin et al, 2021). By simultaneously analysing situations that should not be affected by the closure of Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org the airport, we have ensured that the differences in PNCs between the times before and after the closure are not due to meteorological variations or other contributing factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particle size distribution for the 9 sources identified by the model. Solid lines represent the sources which were also found using PMF inTremper et al (2022), while dashed lines are new findings. Characterization of source 1, which was identified as airport.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%