2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of information for discriminating dynamic human actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that 10-month-olds found these featural changes salient is not unexpected, as it simply matches previous findings with adults (Loucks & Baldwin, 2009) and infants (Loucks and Sommerville, under review). This sensitivity is likely a key step towards gaining a functional understanding of other’s action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that 10-month-olds found these featural changes salient is not unexpected, as it simply matches previous findings with adults (Loucks & Baldwin, 2009) and infants (Loucks and Sommerville, under review). This sensitivity is likely a key step towards gaining a functional understanding of other’s action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Processing of others’ behavior is selectively focused on analyzing the features of action, such as how a hand contacts an object, in adulthood (Loucks & Baldwin, 2009) and infancy (Loucks & Sommerville, under review). These results indicate that one possible reason why infants are biased to selectively attend to featural information is that they are beginning to process action with respect to its functional consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loucks and Baldwin (2009) created sets of video triads that included a standard-action video, a video altered solely in featural information, and a video altered solely in configural information. Featural changes were modifications in the local detail of the action performed, with no alteration of the global spatial trajectories of body parts.…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility would be that the important information for recognition is distributed across time and space and participants are intrinsically variable in their efficiency in accessing such information (Pollick, Lestou, Ryu, & Cho, 2002). Both these explanations suggest that the information available to observers to make their decisions varies, and thus so does performance (Loucks & Baldwin, 2009;Pollick & Paterson, 2008). However, another possible source of variability in recognizing biological motion could be the ability of the observer, and in this chapter we will explore this possibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%