2021
DOI: 10.1017/ash.2021.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of exposure identified through structured interviews of healthcare workers who test positive for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A prospective analysis at two teaching hospitals

Abstract: We interviewed 1,208 healthcare workers with positive SARS-CoV-2 tests between October 2020 and June 2021 to determine likely exposure sources. Overall, 689 (57.0%) had community exposures (479 from household members), 76 (6.3%) had hospital exposures (64 from other employees including 49 despite masking), 11 (0.9%) had community and hospital exposures, and 432 (35.8%) had no identifiable source of exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One quasi-experimental study found no difference in healthcare personnel infection rates between two hospitals that had identical infection control policies except that one used negative pressure rooms for 96% of COVID-19 patient days whereas the other only used negative pressure rooms for 22% of COVID-19 patient days [77 ▪ ]. The study design was not optimal to detect small differences in hospital-acquired infections, however, because most healthcare personnel infections are acquired in the community [78]; this creates substantial noise when trying to elucidate risk factors for hospital-based transmission.…”
Section: Structural Approaches To Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One quasi-experimental study found no difference in healthcare personnel infection rates between two hospitals that had identical infection control policies except that one used negative pressure rooms for 96% of COVID-19 patient days whereas the other only used negative pressure rooms for 22% of COVID-19 patient days [77 ▪ ]. The study design was not optimal to detect small differences in hospital-acquired infections, however, because most healthcare personnel infections are acquired in the community [78]; this creates substantial noise when trying to elucidate risk factors for hospital-based transmission.…”
Section: Structural Approaches To Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design was not optimal to detect small differences in hospital-acquired infections, however, because most healthcare personnel infections are acquired in the community [78]; this creates substantial noise when trying to elucidate risk factors for hospital-based transmission.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%