2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of angle-dependent errors in terrestrial laser scanner-based crop stand measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, uncertainties still remain about the influence of the scanning angle and the fixed position of the scanner during the measurements. As maintained by Ehlert and Heisig [62]-the scanning angle can cause overestimations in the height of reflection points and should be considered in the calculation of heights. In this study, the crop surface was determined from the merged and cleaned point clouds of four scan positions, filtered with a scheme for selecting maximum points.…”
Section: Tls-derived Plant Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, uncertainties still remain about the influence of the scanning angle and the fixed position of the scanner during the measurements. As maintained by Ehlert and Heisig [62]-the scanning angle can cause overestimations in the height of reflection points and should be considered in the calculation of heights. In this study, the crop surface was determined from the merged and cleaned point clouds of four scan positions, filtered with a scheme for selecting maximum points.…”
Section: Tls-derived Plant Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 In a previous study of plant height determination, Ehlert et al [13][14][15] proposed an approach of observing plant height in flat areas with a known ground level. The laser scanner is mounted on a tool carrier with an inclination angle (φ) to observe the plant from above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, also lower parts of the plants are captured. This influence of the scanning angles is also stated by Ehlert and Heisig (2013). However they detected overestimations in the height of reflection points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Those systems apply a two-dimensional profiling scanners based on a moving ground vehicle for achieving an areal coverage. Conceivable MLS approaches are presented by Ehlert and Heisig (2013) and Kukko et al (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%