2020
DOI: 10.4000/ripes.2212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources d’influence de l’engagement des étudiants dans un dispositif de classe inversée à l’université : le cas de PedagInnov

Abstract: Sources d'influence de l'engagement des étudiants dans un dispositif de classe inversée à l'université : le cas de PedagInnov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, Gerard and Rubio [18] reported that Prégent [19] consider engagement along two dimensions-cognitive engagement and behavioral engagementby linking it to student conduct, such as perseverance, class participation, punctuality, and involvement in learning situations. Cognitive engagement is the intellectual…”
Section: School Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, Gerard and Rubio [18] reported that Prégent [19] consider engagement along two dimensions-cognitive engagement and behavioral engagementby linking it to student conduct, such as perseverance, class participation, punctuality, and involvement in learning situations. Cognitive engagement is the intellectual…”
Section: School Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…work put into learning by the student [20]- [22] and is shown by concentration, attention, and learning strategies [18].…”
Section: School Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the necessary conditions for the successful implementation of a pedagogical innovation is precisely the motivation and engagement of the students. A wait-and-see attitude or rejection on the part of the students would undermine the entire system [16].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical data revealed that this FC is known for its multiple advantages: namely, development of disciplinary and transversal skills by virtue of a better appropriation of formalized knowledge, differentiation between teaching and learning [34], [45], enhanced interactions, and improved student engagement through greater autonomy, exchanges and personalized contacts between students and teachers, and personalized support [46]. In addition, it allows a fruitful combination between a direct transmission of knowledge and a constructivist or even a socio-constructivist approach of learning [8], [47], [48], the use of self-regulated learning strategies by the students themselves, and above all, an increased motivation and improved outcomes for the most disadvantaged students [7], [16], [34], [45].…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation