2016
DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-6211-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources and transformations of anthropogenic nitrogen along an urban river–estuarine continuum

Abstract: Abstract. Urbanization has altered the fate and transport of anthropogenic nitrogen (N) in rivers and estuaries globally. This study evaluates the capacity of an urbanizing river–estuarine continuum to transform N inputs from the world's largest advanced (e.g., phosphorus and biological N removal) wastewater treatment facility. Effluent samples and surface water were collected monthly along the Potomac River estuary from Washington D.C. to the Chesapeake Bay over a distance of 150 km. In conjunction with box m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High NO3 uptake rates followed elevated NO3 concentrations in the Aransas River (Fig. ), suggesting that increased assimilatory WWTP N uptake was the primary response of river organisms to this WWTP input (Pennino et al ). However, the low uptake velocities of both NO3 (0.030 mm s −1 ) and NH4+ (0.007 mm s −1 ) in the Aransas River, coupled with less relative denitrification, suggest that the N inputs of the WWTP overwhelmed the capacity of the river ecosystem to process N, reflected by sustained DIN export during the drought (Martí et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High NO3 uptake rates followed elevated NO3 concentrations in the Aransas River (Fig. ), suggesting that increased assimilatory WWTP N uptake was the primary response of river organisms to this WWTP input (Pennino et al ). However, the low uptake velocities of both NO3 (0.030 mm s −1 ) and NH4+ (0.007 mm s −1 ) in the Aransas River, coupled with less relative denitrification, suggest that the N inputs of the WWTP overwhelmed the capacity of the river ecosystem to process N, reflected by sustained DIN export during the drought (Martí et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input of wastewater can increase N export and water quantity (Bowen and Valiela ; Carey and Migliaccio ; Iverson et al ). Additionally, the effects of WWTP inputs to rivers are enhanced during drought (Andersen et al ; Passell et al ) or seasonal low flow (Pennino et al ), because the effluent proportion of the river flow increases. High NO3 uptake rates followed elevated NO3 concentrations in the Aransas River (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estuaries receive high loads of dissolved and particulate carbon and nutrients from rivers (Borges & Abril, ). These input rates are generally elevated in waters receiving effluent from sewage treatment plants (STP) and catchments featuring heavily modified land use, which are often cleared of vegetation and lack riparian buffering (Pennino et al, ). Due to the availability of excess organic carbon entering the tidal river estuarine continuum, estuarine waters are generally supersaturated in CO 2 , which can lead to high CO 2 fluxes to the atmosphere (Staehr et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He confirmed that wastewater-derived dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) significantly influenced phytoplankton biomass in the estuaries. Pennino et al (2016) examined the transformations of nitrogen derived from a wastewater treatment facility, based on the nitrogen mass balance and the δ 15 N and oxygen stable isotope ratios (δ 18 O) in the tidal Potomac River estuary from Washington, D.C., to the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and shallow bays are dynamic environments, influenced by tidal variations and inflow of freshwater from rivers and channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%