Sources and quality of literature addressing femoroacetabular impingement

Ayeni, Olufemi R.; Chan, Kevin; Al-Asiri, Jamal; Chien, Teresa; Sprague, Sheila; Liew, Susan; Bhandari, Mohit

doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2236-7

Cited by 47 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…An estimated 84% of adults used the internet on a regular basis in 2015, and 60% of adults reported having accessed health-related information online in the previous month. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Video-sharing sites such as YouTube have become popular resources for health information. More than 1.9 billion users visit The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: R.F.L.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 Despite the common usage of the internet and You-Tube to gain an understanding of medical issues, 82% of patients either never or only sometimes discuss this online information with their physicians. 3 Having educated themselves based on online information prior to their office visits, patients may present with a presumptive diagnosis in mind and a preferred treatment based on this information. Indeed, 75% of patients with chronic conditions report that their last online search of the illness affected a decision about their treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

Kunze

Cohn

Wakefield

et al. 2019

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) of the knee. Methods: The first 50 videos specific to the PCL identified through the YouTube query posterior cruciate ligament were evaluated by a method of video selection demonstrated to be feasible in prior YouTube studies. Videos were classified by content and upload source. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range 0-5). Video educational content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4) and the PCL Score (PCLS) (score range 0-18). Analysis of variance was used to determine differences in video reliability and educational content quality based on video content and upload source. Multivariate linear regressions were used to identify predictors of video reliability and educational content quality. Results: The mean number of views per video was 50,477.9 AE 15,036. Collectively, the 50 videos were viewed 14,141,285 times. Video content was classified primarily as information about disease (62.0%). The most common upload sources were physicians (24.0%) and nonphysician health care providers (26.0%). Significant between-group interactions were found between video source and the JAMA score, with physicians and medical sources having significantly higher mean JAMA scores (P ¼ 0.037). Videos uploaded by physicians were an independent positive predictor of greater JAMA scores (b:1.27; P ¼ 0.008). Videos uploaded by a medical source (b:2.06; P ¼ 0.038) were an independent positive predictor of a greater GQS. There were no independent associations between video content category or upload source and the PCLS. Conclusions: Videos concerning the PCL were frequently viewed on YouTube, but the educational quality and reliability of these videos were low. Clinical Relevance: Physicians and health care providers treating PCL pathology should take the initiative to counsel patients about which outside resources are reliable to better inform patients about their treatment decisions. With regard to YouTube videos specifically, providers should caution their patients that this source of information may be unreliable.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

Kunze

Cohn

Wakefield

et al. 2019

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is represented both in the clinical and research realms by the increased number of surgeons performing the procedure58 59 and the increase in publications addressing the topic 60 61…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Limited evidence that arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty is better than debridement alone in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…2 Many available studies have been single surgeon-based, retrospective in design, with limited study populations, but the trend toward prospectively designed higher quality evidence has become apparent in recent years. 3,4 This registerbased study is another step in the right direction toward obtaining improved evidence with its prospective design, meticulous data collection, and mid-term follow-up. These results are also promising for the aspiring surgeon aiming to help patients with FAI.…”

Section: See Related Article On Page 2131mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial Commentary: Femoroacetabular Impingement and Evidence: Are We There Yet?

Ayeni

2018

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Femoroacetabular impingement has been established as an impactful cause of hip pain and dysfunction in the young active individual. Improving evidence from well-conducted studies will continue to refine indications and outcomes and perhaps lead to more questions, such as: "How was the capsule managed?" "What was the patient compliance rate with rehabilitation?" "What was the impact of surgical morphology correction on clinical outcome?" "Did cartilage status impact clinical outcome?" and "Was there a noticeable learning curve reflected in outcomes?" These are all important questions that should be addressed in future studies.

show abstract

Sources and quality of literature addressing femoroacetabular impingement

Abstract: IV.

Cited by 47 publications

References 17 publications

YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

Limited evidence that arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty is better than debridement alone in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

Editorial Commentary: Femoroacetabular Impingement and Evidence: Are We There Yet?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About