1997
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source signature estimation based on the removal of first‐order multiples

Abstract: The estimation of the source signature is often one of the necessary first steps in the processing of seismic reflection data, especially if the processing chain includes prestack multiple removal. However, most methods for source estimation are based on poststack data or assume that the earth is 1-D. In this work, a new source estimation method for prestack data is presented. It consists of finding the source signature that permits the removal of events attributable to the first-order free-surface reflections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During the second stage, measures are taken to compensate for imperfections in the multiple predictions. For SRME, predicted multiples often include source signatures and directivity patterns that differ from those present in the data ͑see, e.g., Verschuur et al, 1992;Ikelle et al, 1997͒. Moreover, 2D SRME produces errors in the predicted multiples because of 3D complexity of the earth ͑Dragoset and Jeričević, 1998; Ross et al, 1999;Verschuur, 2006͒, whereas recently developed full 3D-SRME algorithms can suffer from imperfections related to incomplete acquisitions ͑see, e.g., Lin et al, 2004;Moore and Dragoset, 2004;van Borselen et al, 2004;van Dedem and Verschuur, 2005͒, including erroneous reconstructions of missing near offsets ͑Dragoset and Jeričević, 1998͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the second stage, measures are taken to compensate for imperfections in the multiple predictions. For SRME, predicted multiples often include source signatures and directivity patterns that differ from those present in the data ͑see, e.g., Verschuur et al, 1992;Ikelle et al, 1997͒. Moreover, 2D SRME produces errors in the predicted multiples because of 3D complexity of the earth ͑Dragoset and Jeričević, 1998; Ross et al, 1999;Verschuur, 2006͒, whereas recently developed full 3D-SRME algorithms can suffer from imperfections related to incomplete acquisitions ͑see, e.g., Lin et al, 2004;Moore and Dragoset, 2004;van Borselen et al, 2004;van Dedem and Verschuur, 2005͒, including erroneous reconstructions of missing near offsets ͑Dragoset and Jeričević, 1998͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current multiple attenuation methods for surface seismic data (e.g. Carvalho, Weglein and Stolt 1991; Verschuur, Berkhout and Wapenaar 1992; Dragoset 1994; Menger, Marek and Heinze 1996; Ikelle, Roberts and Weglein 1997; Weglein et al . 1997) take the view that the direct wave must be muted as a prerequisite step to the multiple attenuation process and that receiver ghost events can be treated as part of an effective source signature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, the source signature is unknown. Several strategies based on the suppression of multiples have been presented to estimate the operator A( f ) Carvalho & Weglein, 1994;van Borselen et al, 1996;Ikelle et al, 1997). In these studies, the estimation of the operator A( f ) is non-linear, which is an undesirable characteristic in the inversion process (Verschuur, 2006).…”
Section: Surface-related Multiple Elimination (Srme)mentioning
confidence: 99%