2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source rates and ion recycling rates for Na and K in Mercury's atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
96
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Charged particle and photon sputtering work on the first few monolayers of the surface grains, so pre-sputtered atoms must first make their way to the monolayers by diffusion. Gardening rates for the crust are much faster than the time required to deplete a grain of a given species, providing a constant supply of neutrals to the exosphere (Killen et al, 2004). Based upon the Mariner 10 observations, the magnetospheric reconfiguratim time is only a few minutes Slavin and Holzer, 1979a;Luhmann et al, 1998).…”
Section: Magnetosphere?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Charged particle and photon sputtering work on the first few monolayers of the surface grains, so pre-sputtered atoms must first make their way to the monolayers by diffusion. Gardening rates for the crust are much faster than the time required to deplete a grain of a given species, providing a constant supply of neutrals to the exosphere (Killen et al, 2004). Based upon the Mariner 10 observations, the magnetospheric reconfiguratim time is only a few minutes Slavin and Holzer, 1979a;Luhmann et al, 1998).…”
Section: Magnetosphere?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling rates for these studies were 10-1596. Killen et al (2004) utilized a new model (see Sarantos 2000) that, unlike Delcourt et al (2003), takes into account radial magnetic field orientation. Their ion initial energies were also -1 eV.…”
Section: Magnetosphere?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Self sputtering" is itself an inconsequential source for the exosphere [e.g., 1298 Delcourt et al, Poppe et al, 2013] as the recycled ion fluxes are a small 1299 portion of the inferred neutral efflux (~10 7 Na cm -2 s -1 ). However, recycling could be 1300 important if ions neutralized in the soil increase the available reservoir for trace 1301 species [Killen et al, 2004]. High ion recycling rates will obviously increase the 1302 reservoir for exogenous species of the exosphere that are in balance with the solar 1303 wind influx (e.g., He, Ne); but they could also increase the reservoir for exospheric 1304 Na and K, which are very nearly depleted on the dayside [Leblanc and Johnson, 2003, 1305 to levels that can be supported by grain diffusion [Killen et al, 2004].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recycling could be 1300 important if ions neutralized in the soil increase the available reservoir for trace 1301 species [Killen et al, 2004]. High ion recycling rates will obviously increase the 1302 reservoir for exogenous species of the exosphere that are in balance with the solar 1303 wind influx (e.g., He, Ne); but they could also increase the reservoir for exospheric 1304 Na and K, which are very nearly depleted on the dayside [Leblanc and Johnson, 2003, 1305 to levels that can be supported by grain diffusion [Killen et al, 2004]. Broad 1306 bands of nightside precipitation of Na+ with fluxes ~10 5 Na+ cm -2 s -1 and extending 1307 up to ±50° latitude form when realistic conditions about the surface conductance are 1308 adopted [Seki et al, 2013].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LJ2003, some of the possible exospheric signatures induced by the impoverishment of the dayside surface were Simulated. Killen et al (2004) also calculated how surface depletion might impact the local surface ejection rates. These authors showed, as an example, how the reservoir for thermal desorption (TD) is quickly reduced with increasing local time, so that the TD rate becomes of the same order of magnitude as the photon stimulated desorption (PSD) rate (see Leblanc et al 2007 for further explanations of these processes).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%