Source of the Variation in Meat and Bone Meal Nutritional Quality

Hendriks, W.H.; Cottam, Y. H.; Morel, P. C. H.; Thomas, David G.

doi:10.5713/ajas.2004.94

Cited by 18 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides, CF, the result of EE is also aligned with earlier studies where EE was 12.2% (Garcia et al, 2006). However, the result differs with the findings of other investigators who reported it 7.2% (Jacob, 2015), 10.0% (Hendriks et al, 2002), 8.5%-14.8% (Ziggers, 2010) and 10.0% (Hendriks et al, 2004).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 98%

“…In present study, wide ranges of variations in the DM contents of MBM were observed. The results are in line with previous studies where DM was reported to be 95.0% (Wapak, 1848) 95.4% (Hendriks et al, 2002), 94.3% (Nash and Mathews, 1971), 95.3% (Hendriks et al, 2004). However, the result slightly differs with the findings of other investigators who reported 93.0% (Jacob, 2015), 96.9% (Garcia et al, 2006) and 88.8-97.0% (Ziggers, 2010) DM in MBM.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The current result of TA contents is in line with previous studies where TA was 25.3% (Garcia et al, 2006). However, the result differs with the findings of other investigators who reported it 27.0% (Moutinho et al, 2017), 28.4% (Hendriks et al, 2002), 29.2% (Nash and Mathews, 1971), 28.1% (Hendriks et al, 2004). Increasing bone ash content has been reported by Dale (1997) and Wang and Parsons (1998) to have a negative effect on protein and energy concentration.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 86%

“…The average CP content in present study was 53% which is in well agreement with earlier studies where it was reported 53.0% (Moutinho et al, 2017), 54.0% (Nash and Mathews, 1971) and 49%-52.8% (Ziggers, 2010). However, the result differs with the reports of other investigators who reported 55.0% (Jacob, 2015), 56.6% (Garcia et al, 2006), 56.8% (Hendriks et al, 2002), 48%-56% , 58% (Wapak, 18848) and 56.7% (Hendriks et al, 2004).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 81%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Nutrient content of meat and bone meal available in the market of Chittagong district of Bangladesh

Hossain

Zummy

Khatun³

et al. 2018

Bang. J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Meat and bone meal (MBM) is a potential source of animal protein for poultry. The study was undertaken to investigate the variations in the chemical composition of MBM available in different feed markets of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Secondary data from one hundred ten different MBM samples were analyzed in triplicate for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE) and total ash (TA) in the Poultry Research and Training Centre laboratory of Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chittagong, Bangladesh during 21st October 2014 to 2nd December 2016. Data were collected, compiled and analyzed. Results indicated that, there were wide ranges of variations in the chemical compositions for different parameters. DM varied from 91.9 to 98.7% and CP varied from 18.5 to 74.5%. Similarly, CF varied from 1.1 to 2.9% and EE varied from 7.5 to 45.0%. TA varied from 4.8 to 33.6%. There was a strong negative relationship between CP and TA (r=-0.831; R2=0.691; P<0.001). However, DM and TA were positively correlated (r=0.374; R2=0.139; P=0.003). It was concluded that, chemical composition of MBM is widely variable. Wet chemistry analysis is suggested before inclusion of MBM in the diets of dairy, poultry and pet animals. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 2018. 47 (1): 28-34

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 98%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 81%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Nutrient content of meat and bone meal available in the market of Chittagong district of Bangladesh

Hossain

Zummy

Khatun³

et al. 2018

Bang. J. Anim. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The tested PAP sources largely varied in chemical composition, digestibility of nutrients, and AME n value, which is in line with earlier findings in the literature (Hendriks et al, , 2004. In particular, the ash and protein contents of the PAP sources showed large variations.…”

Section: Nutritional Value Of Pap Sourcessupporting

confidence: 82%

Effect of four processed animal proteins in the diet on digestibility and performance in laying hens

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experiment was performed to investigate the effect of animal vs. vegetable protein sources in the diet of laying hens on the development of hen performance. A diet containing protein sources of only vegetable origin was compared with 4 diets, each containing 1 of 4 processed animal proteins (PAP). Two PAP (Daka-58 and Sonac-60) were classified as meat meals, and the remaining 2 (Daka-40 and Sonac-50) were classified as meat and bone meals. First, fecal digestibility of nutrients in the PAP was determined in Lohmann Brown layers. Hens (n = 132) were housed in 22 cages (6 hens/cage) and allotted to 5 dietary treatments. In the PAP diets (4 replicates/treatment), 100 g/kg of CP of animal origin was added, replacing soybean meal and corn (Zea mays) in the basal diet (6 replicates/treatment). The PAP sources differed largely in chemical composition and digestibility coefficients. Energy content (AME(n)) varied from 1,817 (Daka-40) to 3,107 kcal/kg (Sonac-60), and digestible lysine varied from 15.4 (Daka-40) to 28.3 g/kg (Sonac-50). Subsequently, the effect of a control diet (without PAP) vs. 4 PAP diets (50 g/kg of CP of animal origin from the same batches as used in the digestibility study) on performance was determined. All diets were isocaloric (AME(n) = 2,825 kcal/kg) and isonitrogenous (digestible lysine = 6.8 g/kg). Hens were housed in 40 floor pens (12 hens/pen, 8 pens/treatment) from 20 to 40 wk of age. Feed intake levels of the hens fed the meat and bone meal diets were reduced compared with those of hens fed the meat meal diets, whereas the feed intake level of hens fed the control diet was intermediate. Laying hen performance differed between treatments, being was most favorable for the Sonac-50 treatment and most adverse for the Daka-40 treatment. Differences in laying hen performance seemed to be related partly to differences in feed intake and corresponding amino acid intake.

show abstract

Tools and Methods to Quantify the Digestion of Protein, Lipid, Starch and Fibre from a Chemistry/Microbiology Perspective

Montoya

Hodgkinson

Moughan

2019

Interdisciplinary Approaches to Food Digestion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Source of the Variation in Meat and Bone Meal Nutritional Quality

Cited by 18 publications

References 14 publications

Nutrient content of meat and bone meal available in the market of Chittagong district of Bangladesh

Nutrient content of meat and bone meal available in the market of Chittagong district of Bangladesh

Effect of four processed animal proteins in the diet on digestibility and performance in laying hens

Tools and Methods to Quantify the Digestion of Protein, Lipid, Starch and Fibre from a Chemistry/Microbiology Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About