2002
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000021002.17394.7f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source of Microembolic Signals in Patients With High-Grade Carotid Stenosis

Abstract: Background and Purpose-In patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses, the relationship between carotid plaque characteristics and transcranial Doppler (TCD)-detected microembolic signals (MES) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between macroscopically described plaque characteristics and MES in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Methods-Sequential patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent preoperative 30-minute TCD monitorin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
38
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…50 In patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, sources of asymptomatic microembolic signals may include ulcerated plaques 51 and microscopic platelet aggregates and fibrin clots. 52 Asymptomatic cerebral microembolization was associated with an increased risk of further cerebral ischemia (OR ϭ 8.10, 95% CI ϭ 1.58 to 41.57) in this setting. 51 Comparison between studies is difficult because of differences in diagnostic criteria and detection threshold, different instruments, different instrument settings, nature and severity of disease, variability in occurrence of microembolic signals, time between last symptom and detection of microembolic signals, and type of treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…50 In patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, sources of asymptomatic microembolic signals may include ulcerated plaques 51 and microscopic platelet aggregates and fibrin clots. 52 Asymptomatic cerebral microembolization was associated with an increased risk of further cerebral ischemia (OR ϭ 8.10, 95% CI ϭ 1.58 to 41.57) in this setting. 51 Comparison between studies is difficult because of differences in diagnostic criteria and detection threshold, different instruments, different instrument settings, nature and severity of disease, variability in occurrence of microembolic signals, time between last symptom and detection of microembolic signals, and type of treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…65,69 In the 2 largest gross inspection studies, old hemosiderin-laden plaques were also considered examples of IPH. 22,23 For macroscopy, IPH was usually characterized by its immediate recognition or on transecting the plaques at the time of arteriotomy.…”
Section: Definition Of Iphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 This incidence increased to 27% with 8 hours of monitoring and to 46% with 16 hours of monitoring. 3 Although these patients' risk of stroke may be low, 4 reduced cognitive function 5 and silent infarctions 6 are more frequent in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis compared with controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%