2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11005-010-0416-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Identity and Kernel Functions for Elliptic Calogero–Sutherland Type Systems

Abstract: Kernel functions related to quantum many-body systems of Calogero-Sutherland type are discussed, in particular for the elliptic case. The main result is an elliptic generalization of an identity due to Sen that is a source for many such kernel functions. Applications are given, including simple exact eigenfunctions and corresponding eigenvalues of Chalykh-Feigin-Veselov-Sergeev-type deformations of the elliptic Calogero-Sutherland model for special parameter values. MSC-class: 81Q05, 16R60

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Source identities for all quantum Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models where obtained and used to derive kernel functions in [6]. A source identity allowing to derive kernel functions for the elliptic generalizations of the Sutherland model and their deformations was presented in [29]. The present paper generalizes, to the elliptic case, results previously obtained in [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Source identities for all quantum Calogero-Moser-Sutherland models where obtained and used to derive kernel functions in [6]. A source identity allowing to derive kernel functions for the elliptic generalizations of the Sutherland model and their deformations was presented in [29]. The present paper generalizes, to the elliptic case, results previously obtained in [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is obvious that Ψ N,M 0 (x, y; g) in (2.3) is invariant if all variables x j and y k are shifted by the same constant. Thus D N,M Ψ N,M 0 in (2.6b) can be obtained from Proposition 2.1 in[42] as the special case q = 0, N = N + M, m J = 1 for 1 ≤ J ≤ N, and m J = −1/λ for N + 1 ≤ J ≤ N + M (note that g here corresponds to λ in[42]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We stress that (32) is formal since we neither specified the integration domain nor the parameters Q, Q ′ , and these details are important to get well-defined solutions. However, if we ignore such details for now, we can proceed with formal computations using (27)- (29) and dropping boundary terms obtained by partial integrations used to transfer the action of the differential operator (details on this computation are given in the proof of Lemma 4.2 below). We thus find that ψ N (x) = (K QQ ′ N M ψ M )(x) satisfies (30) with…”
Section: Outline Of Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are left to prove that, if ψ M (y) satisfies (29), then ψ N (x) in (32) satisfies (30). To simplify notation, we write in the following short for [−π−iǫ,π−iǫ] M , and we use the short hand notations |x| = j x j and similarly for |y|.…”
Section: Integral Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation