2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source identification and contribution of land uses to the observed values of heavy metals in soil samples of the border between the Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland by receptor models and redundancy analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, some arsenic-bearing sulfide and oxide rocks migrate into soil via weathering and rain erosion [ 46 ], and the As contents of natural soil range from 0.2 mg/kg to 40 mg/kg. Therefore, Factor 1 can be concluded to represent the parent material, i.e., a geological source [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, some arsenic-bearing sulfide and oxide rocks migrate into soil via weathering and rain erosion [ 46 ], and the As contents of natural soil range from 0.2 mg/kg to 40 mg/kg. Therefore, Factor 1 can be concluded to represent the parent material, i.e., a geological source [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aydin et al 43 found significant Cu content in pesticides and phosphate rock (for phosphate fertilizer application) (see Table S7); fungicides and phosphorus fertilizers have a joint effect on Cu accumulation in agricultural soils. 26 Dong et al 44 and Giersz et al 45 also confirmed that the Hg contamination in soils mainly came from the application of Hg-containing pesticides and sludge fertilizers. With a similar analytical approach, the sources of soil HMs in ASA were interpreted as follows: (1) factor 1 corresponds to agricultural activities; (2) factor 2 corresponds to dry and wet deposition; and (3) factor 3 corresponds to geological sources.…”
Section: Hm Fractions In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model was used to calculate the precise contribution rates of HM pollution sources for paddy soils in eluvial and alluvial areas. The PMF model has been successfully applied to resolve the pollution source apportionment in air, soil, and sediment matrices . It not only can quantitatively analyze HMs but also has the advantages of not requiring measurement of the source component spectrum, non-negative elements in the decomposition matrix, and the use of standard deviations of data for optimization .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multivariate statistical analysis, including principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis (CA), is widely employed to identify pollution sources (Long et al, 2021). Quantitative receptor models, positive matrix factorization (PMF), UNMIX, and absolute principal component analysis‐multiple linear regression (APCS‐MLR) can identify and quantify pollutant sources in the atmosphere, sediments, waters, and urban soils (Mehr et al, 2017; Mohammad et al, 2016; Sakizadeh & Zhang, 2021; Shen et al, 2021). Recently, receptor models have been successfully applied in quantifying pollutant sources in farmland soils (Zhang, Yan, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%