2021
DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0186.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source deghosting of coarsely sampled common-receiver data using a convolutional neural network

Abstract: It is well known that source deghosting can best be applied to common-receiver gathers, while receiver deghosting can best be applied to common-shot records. The source-ghost wavefield observed in the common-shot domain contains the imprint of the subsurface, which complicates source deghosting in common-shot domain, in particular when the subsurface is complex. Unfortunately, the alternative, i.e., the common-receiver domain, is often coarsely sampled, which complicates source deghosting in this domain as wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few other papers have also used the U‐net structure for pressure‐only deghosting with high‐quality results (de Jonge, Vinje, Zhao, et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2021; Vrolijk & Blacquière, 2021). In our case, we are confident that a U‐net structure will also give good results on dual‐component data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few other papers have also used the U‐net structure for pressure‐only deghosting with high‐quality results (de Jonge, Vinje, Zhao, et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2021; Vrolijk & Blacquière, 2021). In our case, we are confident that a U‐net structure will also give good results on dual‐component data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this paper focuses on the receiver ghost problem, but the source ghost problem can also be handled in a similar way as the source and receiver ghosts share similar characteristics. The main difference will be to apply our method on receiver gathers instead of common shot gathers (Vrolijk & Blacquière, 2021) and expect Equation ( 12) to be applied for ghost notches at higher frequencies, as the source depth is generally shallower than the streamer depth.…”
Section: Overlappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing‐based solutions include, but are not limited to, deriving a low‐frequency deghosting filter (Amundsen & Zhou, 2013) and joint deconvolution (Soubaras, 2010). Recently, Almuteri and Sava (2021) and Vrolijk and Blacquière (2021) have also utilized machine learning applications for removing ghost reflections from seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%