2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2018.8513045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Connectivity Analysis Can Assess Recovery of Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of follow-up studies, we (Antonakakis et al, 2016(Antonakakis et al, , 2017a showed less dense connectivity networks in mTBI patients, which was in line with the findings of other groups (Rapp et al, 2015), as well as higher synchronization among mTBI richclub hubs (Antonakakis et al, 2017b). More recently, Li et al (2018) revealed a denser causality network for mTBI patients, whereas Kaltiainen et al (2018) showed that aberrant theta-band activity could provide an early objective sign of brain abnormality after mTBI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a series of follow-up studies, we (Antonakakis et al, 2016(Antonakakis et al, , 2017a showed less dense connectivity networks in mTBI patients, which was in line with the findings of other groups (Rapp et al, 2015), as well as higher synchronization among mTBI richclub hubs (Antonakakis et al, 2017b). More recently, Li et al (2018) revealed a denser causality network for mTBI patients, whereas Kaltiainen et al (2018) showed that aberrant theta-band activity could provide an early objective sign of brain abnormality after mTBI.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The potential functional implications of RC organization of MEG intrinsic coupling modes, considering its role in network integration and its vulnerability in various disorders like mTBI, seem to deserve further investigation for diagnostic and clinical purposes. Furthermore, our approach is suitable for accessing the recovery process following mTBI using resting state MEG (Zouridakis et al, 2016 ; Li et al, 2017 ) and focusing not only on the strength of the couplings but also on the dominant type of interactions (Bharath et al, 2015 ; Losoi et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our previous use of connectivity analysis to study mTBI using Granger causality (Zouridakis et al, 2012 ), phase synchronization (Dimitriadis et al, 2015b ), and cross-frequency coupling (Antonakakis et al, 2015 , 2016 ) of spontaneous MEG, as well as brain activation patterns of both EEG and MEG at the sensor (Li et al, 2015 ) and source (Zouridakis et al, 2016 ; Li et al, 2017 ) levels, an obvious question is whether the possible presence of an RC organization could provide some complementary features to the SW organization that is typically seen in mTBI FCGs. Thus, in the present study, we hypothesize that exploring brain connectivity network models derived from spontaneous MEG activity using estimators for both intra and cross-frequency couplings (Buzsáki and Watson, 2012 ) would help identify meaningful network topological features in compromised mTBI brain networks that could be used as guideline biomarkers for validating the recovery from mTBI (Bharath et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 6-month follow-up, however, only three of those seven patients had persistently abnormal low-frequency MEG activity. Li et al (2018) similarly reported attenuation of MEG abnormalities over time in patients with mild TBI [ 24 ]. Using resting-state MEG signal source analysis and Granger causality to determine in-going and out-going connections between brain regions, they compared connectivity networks between 13 patients with mild TBI and eight matched controls.…”
Section: Detection Of Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%