2020
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2019-951
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source apportionment of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Shanghai based on hourly molecular organic markers and other source tracers

Abstract: Abstract. Identification of various sources and quantification of their contributions are a necessary step to formulating scientifically sound pollution control strategies. Receptor model is widely used in source apportionment of fine particles. However, most of the previous studies are based on traditional filter collection and lab analysis of aerosol chemical species (usually ions, elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC) and elements) as inputs. In this study, we conducted robust online measurements of a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a high degree of similarity in PM 2.5 indicates that the two sites are influenced by the same PM pollution sources. Expectedly, PMF results in this work are essentially similar to those obtained by Li et al We refer readers to the study by Li et al for details of the PMF modeling and discussion of source apportionment results. Below we will only present PMF results related to the abovementioned POA markers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such a high degree of similarity in PM 2.5 indicates that the two sites are influenced by the same PM pollution sources. Expectedly, PMF results in this work are essentially similar to those obtained by Li et al We refer readers to the study by Li et al for details of the PMF modeling and discussion of source apportionment results. Below we will only present PMF results related to the abovementioned POA markers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…At our monitoring site (SAES), OC and EC were not available; we thereby "borrowed" the OC and EC data from a nearby urban monitoring station, which was 12 km away (site name: Pudong). We note that a detailed source apportionment analysis utilizing the same set of organic source markers measured in this field campaign is reported in a separate paper by Li et al, 29 in combination with inorganic ions and elemental species at Pudong. 29 Between the SAES site in this work and the Pudong site, their PM 2.5 levels were in excellent agreement and highly in sync, as seen in their nearly overlapping time series, and a slope of 0.95 and a correlation coefficient of 0.96 in their scatter correlation plot (Figure S17).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations