2019
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2019.1696720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sounds of Green: How Brand Name Sounds Metaphorically Convey Environmental Friendliness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, as a starting point future research could depict the existing evidence provided by sound symbolism research focusing specifically on the characteristics that particular consonants could convey to brands. Sound symbolism researchers have found, for instance, that brand names with voiced obstruents may be perceived as harsher by opposition to those with voiceless consonants that are perceived as softer or milder (Pathak, Calvert, & Lim, 2020), or that brands with silent consonants could convey human characteristics metaphorically associated with environmental friendliness, such as good‐heartedness or humility, (e.g., Joshi & Kronrod, 2019). Acknowledging that the in–out effect relies similarly in consonantal phonemes, how do these divergent approaches combine?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, as a starting point future research could depict the existing evidence provided by sound symbolism research focusing specifically on the characteristics that particular consonants could convey to brands. Sound symbolism researchers have found, for instance, that brand names with voiced obstruents may be perceived as harsher by opposition to those with voiceless consonants that are perceived as softer or milder (Pathak, Calvert, & Lim, 2020), or that brands with silent consonants could convey human characteristics metaphorically associated with environmental friendliness, such as good‐heartedness or humility, (e.g., Joshi & Kronrod, 2019). Acknowledging that the in–out effect relies similarly in consonantal phonemes, how do these divergent approaches combine?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this knowledge and trend, it is prudent that firms keep in mind the insights generated by this paper and others in the field of sound symbolism. Sound symbolic names can be especially invaluable in conveying messages that are often difficult to communicate (e.g., complex concepts such as environmental friendliness) (Joshi & Kronrod, 2019). Since brand managers and product designers are often looking for harmony amongst attributes, product A u t h o r ' s f i n a l v e r s i o n features and brand names (Roche et al, 2015), it makes more managerial sense to choose sound symbolic brand names which are congruent with the product features.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reid et al ( 2010 ) argued that PEF was the most preferred dimension for vehicle design which elicit customer purchase behavior. Likewise, Joshi and Kronrod ( 2019 ) argued that PEF is considered essential for green product purchase intention. Thus, H1 was accepted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past research studies affirmed that PEF was the enabling factor for future purchase intention and attitude. Joshi and Kronrod ( 2019 ) hypothesized that PEF has a positive association with purchase intention. The experimental study of Reid et al ( 2010 ) argued that PEF help to promote sustainable vehicle design that ultimately affects consumer attitude.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%