2010
DOI: 10.1121/1.3257223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound velocities and thermodynamic properties of water to 700 MPa and −10 to 100 °C

Abstract: Sound velocities in liquid water were measured by the method of impulsive stimulated scattering in a sapphire-windowed high-pressure cell from -10 to 100 degrees C and pressures as high as 700 MPa. Velocity measurements are compared with previous experimental efforts relative to the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS-95) formulation for the equations of state. At 0 and -10 degrees C, sound velocities are in agreement with the one previously published study at sub-zero temper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The speed of sound w in the liquid mixture was determined by measuring the time delay Δ t between both reflected echoes by using a digital overlap method described in a previous paper . The difference in acoustic path length Δ l required for converting time delay to speed of sound was determined through calibration with water. The temperature was measured directly into the fluid with an uncertainty of 0.1 K and the pressure was measured by using a pressure gauge in direct contact with the fluid inside the measurement cell so as to avoid isolating a part of the fluid from the sensing area and thus avoid modification of the feed composition. The pressure sensor was calibrated as a function of temperature against a primary standard pressure sensor with an uncertainty better than 0.02% on the full scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed of sound w in the liquid mixture was determined by measuring the time delay Δ t between both reflected echoes by using a digital overlap method described in a previous paper . The difference in acoustic path length Δ l required for converting time delay to speed of sound was determined through calibration with water. The temperature was measured directly into the fluid with an uncertainty of 0.1 K and the pressure was measured by using a pressure gauge in direct contact with the fluid inside the measurement cell so as to avoid isolating a part of the fluid from the sensing area and thus avoid modification of the feed composition. The pressure sensor was calibrated as a function of temperature against a primary standard pressure sensor with an uncertainty better than 0.02% on the full scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in path length Δ L is calibrated with water as for this reference component reliable data were reported. During calibration, the effects of dilation and compression on the acoustic wave sensor were taken into account by considering a linear behavior in both temperature and pressure: The path length difference Δ L 0 at the reference temperature ( T 0 = 293.15 K) and pressure ( P 0 = 0.1013 MPa) as well as a and b parameters are estimated by calibration with water. The uncertainty of the path length calibrated in this way is evaluated to 0.02% by combining the uncertainty in speed of sound data with uncertainty measurements involved in the calibration (Δ t water , T , p ).…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and provided Wilson's (1959) empirical regression for the speed of sound V w (longitudinal wave in m s À1 ) in pure water (Chen and Millero, 1976), whereas in the laboratory, the more recent correlation models (Lemmon et al, 2012a;Wagner and Pruss, 2002) or more recent formulas (Belogol'skii et al, 1999;Lin and Trusler, 2012;Vance and Brown, 2010) may be preferable if greater accuracy is desired. That said, the adiabatic bulk modulus predicted using eqns [39] and [40] from Batzle and Wang (1992) agrees well with other models (Figure 8).…”
Section: Correlative Eos Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%