Sound Trust and the Ethics of Telecare

Voerman, S.A.; Nickel, Philip J.

doi:10.1093/jmp/jhw035

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trust involves a complex of predictive and normative expectations based on the interests, motives, and past performance of the trusted entity (Voerman and Nickel 2017). With a few notable exceptions (Hardin 2006), many scholars, including some Shara Shara is considering going to a hospital because she believes she may have been exposed to HIV in a sexual encounter (although she believes the risk is very low).…”

Section: Interests In Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Manson and O'Neill (2007) put forward an ideal of 'intelligent trust' that emphasizes the virtues or talents of an individual truster in making good choices about whom to trust. Others advance a notion of 'healthy trust' or 'sound trust' that emphasizes the importance of the environment as well as the individual in creating the conditions for epistemically grounded and non-exploitative trust (Boenink 2003;Voerman and Nickel 2017). Loosely speaking, the first account emphasizes the internal aspects of warranted trust, and the second account emphasizes the external aspects.…”

Section: Interests In Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Ethics of Medical Data Donation

Krutzinna¹,

Floridi²

2019

Philosophical Studies Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

show abstract

Section: Interests In Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interests In Trustmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ethics of Medical Data Donation

Krutzinna¹,

Floridi²

2019

Philosophical Studies Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trust involves a complex of predictive and normative expectations based on the interests, motives, and past performance of the trusted entity (Voerman & Nickel 2017). With a few notable exceptions (Hardin 2006), many scholars, including some philosophers, take for granted that one can trust institutions (Hawley 2017).…”

Section: Sharamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Manson & O'Neill (2007) put forward an ideal of 'intelligent trust' that emphasizes the virtues or talents of an individual truster in making good choices about whom to trust. Others advance a notion of 'healthy trust' or 'sound trust' that emphasizes the importance of the environment as well as the individual in creating the conditions for epistemically grounded and non-exploitative trust (Boenink 2003, Voerman & Nickel 2017. Loosely speaking, the first account emphasizes the internal aspects of warranted trust, and the second account emphasizes the external aspects.…”

Section: Sharamentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ethics of Uncertainty for Data Subjects

Nickel

2019

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern health data practices come with many practical uncertainties. In this paper I argue that data subjects' trust in the institutions and organizations that control their data, and their ability to know their own moral obligations in relation to their data, are undermined by significant uncertainties regarding the what, how, and who of mass data collection and analysis. I conclude by considering how proposals for managing situations of high uncertainty might be applied to this problem. These emphasize increasing organizational flexibility, knowledge, and capacity, and reducing hazard.

show abstract

“…While there has been a growing interest in the nexus between trust and technology (Nickel, Franssen & Kroes 2010;Åm 2011;Nickel 2011Nickel , 2013Nickel , 2015Nickel & Spahn 2012;Hu et al 2016;Voerman & Nickel 2017; McCall & Baillie 2017; Allen 2018) surprisingly little explicit attention has been given to what we call the socialinstitutional character of trust. Trust is generally essential for ordering and normalising social relations within society (Barnes 1988;Luhmann 1979).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building trust in persuasive gerontechnology: User-centric and institution-centric approaches

Sattarov¹,

Nagel²

2019

Gerontechnology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trust in technology is an important factor for the design and use of technology in general. While there is growing interest in the role of trust on this general level, so far little attention has been given to the particularities of trust in persuasive technologies, i.e. technologies that serve to persuade users into certain behaviours. Those technologies are increasingly targeting the older adults, posing ethical questions that ask for sensitive investigation of trust. Here, we explore the specific character of trust in persuasive gerontechnology. We argue that the question of how to establish trust in technology, how to make trust lasting and enduring, requires considering user-centric and institution-centric approaches, and suggest an approach that is sensitive to wider social and institutional factors. The impact that persuasive gerontechnology can have depends on whether people can trust them, the designers, or the overall system. Drawing on studies of determinants of institutional trust, we identify four main strategies that can inform designers, technology assessors and policy makers in building trust between technology and users: (1) creating novel institutions, (2) creating incentives, (3) providing guarantees, and (4) ensuring transparency. We conclude the discussion with suggestions regarding future directions in researching trust and persuasive technology.

show abstract

Sound Trust and the Ethics of Telecare

Cited by 15 publications

References 41 publications

The Ethics of Medical Data Donation

The Ethics of Medical Data Donation

The Ethics of Uncertainty for Data Subjects

Building trust in persuasive gerontechnology: User-centric and institution-centric approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About