Airborne and impact sound insulation in buildings can be predicted according to the International Standard, ISO 15712 and the identical European Standard, EN 12354. Calculation of the flanking transmission requires knowledge of the vibration reduction indexf or which these standards contain empirical data. This paper investigates the vibration reduction indexf or the specificc ase of heavyweight buildings built from solid masonry/concrete walls and floors by using wave theory to calculate data for L-, T-and X-junctions. Calculations are carried out assuming only bending wave transmission at the junction as well as bending and in-plane wave transmission at the junction. The results showthat the frequency-invariant empirical data in the standards is likely to give rise to errors in the mid-and high-frequencyranges due to the importance of in-plane wave generation at the junction. Regression analysis is used to identify newrelationships that are specifictojunctions of solid heavyweight walls and floors. Forfuture work these give the potential to re-assess the existence of anybias error using the model in the standards and allowgreater insight into the uncertainty associated with the model. been shown to incur bias errors of up to +10 dB in the airborne sound insulation when compared with matrix SEA which considers all possible transmission paths [6,7,8]. Bias errors have not been evident in some comparisons of measured and predicted single-number quantities for airborne and impact sound insulation (e.g. [2,7,8,9]). However, some comparisons do indicate abias error which could be attributed to the input data [9].Craik [6] suggests that one possible reason for not observing ab ias error in the original work [3] is because the empirical K ij data in EN 12354-1 is based upon measurements that (unintentionally)i ncluded flanking transmission from longer flanking paths. Recent work by Hopkins and Robinson [10] using transient and steady-state forms of SEA provides evidence that K ij measurements on heavyweight junctions in both the laboratory and the field will often incur significant errors due to unwanted flanking transmission. In addition, Hopkins and Robinson showt hat it is essential to use as hort evaluation time for structural reverberation times on heavyweight walls and floors. Theyc oncluded that the use of simplified experimental SEA (asincorporated in EN ISO 10848-1 [11] for K ij measurements)with total loss factors determined from structural reverberation times with large evaluation ranges, such as T 20 ,can appear to give the right answer for structural coupling parameters such as K ij ,b ut for the wrong reasons. This is due to the cancellation of twoe rrors; the error in the estimate of the total loss factor and the error due to unwanted flanking transmission.