Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology 2007
DOI: 10.1115/imece2007-41847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound From Flow Over a Rough Surface

Abstract: The mechanism for sound production from flow over a rough surface is not well understood. Measurements of radiated noise and low-wavenumber unsteady surface pressures were carried out in order to better understand the sound production mechanism. The initial results of an ongoing experimental investigation of the sound produced by flow over a rough surface are presented. In order to investigate scaling relationships, the flow speed, roughness height, and roughness element distribution were varied. Previous inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were significant disagreements over suggested scaling laws, controlling parameters and the physical mechanisms behind the theories. The lack of understanding and predictive tools for roughness noise prompted a number of investigations in recent years, including the study of Liu, Dowling & Shin (2006 aimed at evaluating and modelling the contribution of roughness noise to airframe noise, and a concerted effort (Blake et al 2008) consisting of theoretical Glegg & Devenport 2009), experimental (Anderson et al 2007;Smith et al 2008;Alexander et al 2009Alexander et al , 2010, 2013Devenport et al 2010Devenport et al , 2011 and numerical (Yang & Wang 2008 investigations. Liu & Dowling (2007) evaluated Howe's semi-empirical model (Howe 1998) using a number of different smooth wall pressure-spectrum theories with enhanced friction velocities and boundary-layer thicknesses to adjust for the presence of roughness, and 284 Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were significant disagreements over suggested scaling laws, controlling parameters and the physical mechanisms behind the theories. The lack of understanding and predictive tools for roughness noise prompted a number of investigations in recent years, including the study of Liu, Dowling & Shin (2006 aimed at evaluating and modelling the contribution of roughness noise to airframe noise, and a concerted effort (Blake et al 2008) consisting of theoretical Glegg & Devenport 2009), experimental (Anderson et al 2007;Smith et al 2008;Alexander et al 2009Alexander et al , 2010, 2013Devenport et al 2010Devenport et al , 2011 and numerical (Yang & Wang 2008 investigations. Liu & Dowling (2007) evaluated Howe's semi-empirical model (Howe 1998) using a number of different smooth wall pressure-spectrum theories with enhanced friction velocities and boundary-layer thicknesses to adjust for the presence of roughness, and 284 Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have examined the impact of roughness [1][2][3] and discontinuous surface features [4] using wall-jet measurements with a turbulent flow. Various surface topologies have been developed to mitigate the effects of these surfaces on the flow: for instance, the study of flow-generated sound and pressure fluctuations produced by a range of surface treatments, including ordered roughness fetches [5][6][7][8], bioinspired canopy structures [9], and porous surfaces [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%