2014 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference - (IHTC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ihtc.2014.7147543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound and touch based smart cane: Better walking experience for visually challenged

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials found in Literature include the GPS-included sensor-filled cane from Agrawal and Gupta [10]; circuitry-concentrated cane proposal from Damdhare and Sakhare [11]; proposal based on ultrasonic sensors by Dey et al [12]; voice-command by Koley and Mishra [13]; haptic alerts for obstacles by Wang and Kuchenbecker [14]; low cost approach by Kumar et al [15]; electronic sensors by Mahmud et al [16]; overall improved smart-cane by Maidenbaum et al [17] that would offer object type and detection with artificial intelligence (A.I.) by Mavarkar and Mundargi [18]; sound and touch input from Megalingam et al [19], Infrared sensor-based by Nada et al [20], Camera object detection with A.I. by Narayani et al [21]; acoustic obstacle detection feedback by Rodríguez et al [22]; Internet of Things approach by Sharmila [23] that, in a similar way to the Google Lens, requires wearing glasses and using the walking cane; a belt-like obstacle-avoidance system with A.I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials found in Literature include the GPS-included sensor-filled cane from Agrawal and Gupta [10]; circuitry-concentrated cane proposal from Damdhare and Sakhare [11]; proposal based on ultrasonic sensors by Dey et al [12]; voice-command by Koley and Mishra [13]; haptic alerts for obstacles by Wang and Kuchenbecker [14]; low cost approach by Kumar et al [15]; electronic sensors by Mahmud et al [16]; overall improved smart-cane by Maidenbaum et al [17] that would offer object type and detection with artificial intelligence (A.I.) by Mavarkar and Mundargi [18]; sound and touch input from Megalingam et al [19], Infrared sensor-based by Nada et al [20], Camera object detection with A.I. by Narayani et al [21]; acoustic obstacle detection feedback by Rodríguez et al [22]; Internet of Things approach by Sharmila [23] that, in a similar way to the Google Lens, requires wearing glasses and using the walking cane; a belt-like obstacle-avoidance system with A.I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Sfiiyan et al, [6] designed a fast-response smart cane equipped with infrared, ultrasonic and moisture sensors and controlled it with an 18F46K80 microcontroller. R. K. Megalingam [7] supported his smart cane with heat, obstacle detection, and Bluetooth modules; An Arduino module operated the system. The ultrasonic sensor calculated the distance and buzzed the user in case of danger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%