2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorptive H 2 S removal by impregnated activated carbons for the production of SNG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the conclusions drawn above, the rates proposed for 18 % and 50 % nickel catalysts were compared with own basic measurements (cf. 37). An electrically heated fixed‐bed reactor with an internal diameter of 13 mm and a length of 184 mm was used.…”
Section: Rate Analysis Selection and Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the conclusions drawn above, the rates proposed for 18 % and 50 % nickel catalysts were compared with own basic measurements (cf. 37). An electrically heated fixed‐bed reactor with an internal diameter of 13 mm and a length of 184 mm was used.…”
Section: Rate Analysis Selection and Adaptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the conditions of char's production are adjusted in order to obtain materials with suitable properties [27]. Special modifications using chemicals, such as caustic impregnations or activation [28][29][30] and metal impregnation [21,22,[31][32][33][34] are carried out to enhance the activated carbon efficiency. However, these processes have high environmental footprint (use and management of chemicals), increase the cost of the materials and jeopardize their regeneration (low temperature of self-ignition) [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Equipment for the removal of H2S by adsorption (active carbon) (ADSP). This method is one of the most widely used procedures to remove H2S from landfill gas when low concentrations are required (Köchermann et al, 2015). In addition to the physical adsorption, activated carbon significantly improves the H2S removal capacity, as it provides a large catalytic surface for oxidation to elemental sulfur and sulfate (Nam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Decision Hierarchy Structure For Energy Valorization Of Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%