2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption studies of Cu(II) on gooseberry fruit (emblica officinalis) and its removal from electroplating wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). The results obtained were comparable to the SEM results obtained by Rao and Ikram (2011) where the surface of sorbent after and before adsorption were compared for heavy metal Cu (II). This result is comparative to our SEM analysis study were we observed a decrease in pore size after adsorption.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem) Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). The results obtained were comparable to the SEM results obtained by Rao and Ikram (2011) where the surface of sorbent after and before adsorption were compared for heavy metal Cu (II). This result is comparative to our SEM analysis study were we observed a decrease in pore size after adsorption.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscope (Sem) Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Deposition of waste, high operating cost and environmental pollution are some of the limitations that exist. Biosorption proposes to be an efficient, economical and environment friendly technique for metal purification/removal in comparison to the conventional techniques (Rao and Ikram 2011). There are several criteria to be considered while selecting the materials to be used as a biosorbent directly or for the production of sorbent, the main criteria being the raw material availability (Oliveira et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher pH values, the lower number of hydrogen ion and greater number of ligands with negatives charges results in greater metal ions biosorption [33]. The maximum adsorption of metal ions is obtained at pH 5.0 [34], above pH 5, a steady decrease of adsorption of metal ions can be related to the precipitation of metal hydroxide [35,36]. Figure 7 presents the effect of different initial metal ions concentration onto UDL.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many agricultural wastes have been tried out as effective and low-cost adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from waste water. Many of the fruit peels and seeds have also been used as effective sorbents for the removal of heavy metals which include banana peel [7], mango peel [8], orange peel, citrus peel [9], jackfruit peel [10], ponkan peel [11], pomegranate peel [12], watermelon rind [13], gooseberry fruit [14], and pine fruit coat. Heavy metals such as Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , Zn 2+ , Ni 2+ , Cr 6+ , and Cu 2+ are prior toxic pollutants in industrial wastewater, which become common groundwater contaminants and they tend to accumulate in organisms, causing numerous diseases and disorders [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%