“…Data provided by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] indicate that K d(des) ranged between 1.6 and 29.3 L kg −1 (average 6.5) for SDZ, between 3.2 and 133.9 L kg −1 (average 13.5) for SMT, and between 5.3 and 65.4 L kg −1 (average 10.9) for SCP, while the K F(des) values ranged between 0.1 and 36.8 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average 6.4) for SDZ, between 4.3 and 117.6 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 15.7) for SMT, and between 5.2 and 73.7 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 12.1) for SCP (Table 8). These values are very similar to those obtained by other authors, both for the desorption of SDZ [68,84,107,108], of SMT [109], and of SCP [70]. Furthermore, the scores reported by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] for the desorption parameters (K d(des) and K F(des) ) are considerably higher than those obtained for the adsorption parameters (K d(ads) and K F(ads) ), indicating the presence of positive hysteresis, confirmed by the HI parameter, with values higher than 1 in many cases (Table 8), which means that part of the adsorbed antibiotic was retained in the soil after a desorption cycle [110], in accordance with what was observed by other authors who also studied the adsorption and desorption process of SAs in soils [68,70,108,111].…”