2016
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20160159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of Sulfachloropyridazine in Brazilian Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
5
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(65 reference statements)
5
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Data provided by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] indicate that K d(des) ranged between 1.6 and 29.3 L kg −1 (average 6.5) for SDZ, between 3.2 and 133.9 L kg −1 (average 13.5) for SMT, and between 5.3 and 65.4 L kg −1 (average 10.9) for SCP, while the K F(des) values ranged between 0.1 and 36.8 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average 6.4) for SDZ, between 4.3 and 117.6 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 15.7) for SMT, and between 5.2 and 73.7 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 12.1) for SCP (Table 8). These values are very similar to those obtained by other authors, both for the desorption of SDZ [68,84,107,108], of SMT [109], and of SCP [70]. Furthermore, the scores reported by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] for the desorption parameters (K d(des) and K F(des) ) are considerably higher than those obtained for the adsorption parameters (K d(ads) and K F(ads) ), indicating the presence of positive hysteresis, confirmed by the HI parameter, with values higher than 1 in many cases (Table 8), which means that part of the adsorbed antibiotic was retained in the soil after a desorption cycle [110], in accordance with what was observed by other authors who also studied the adsorption and desorption process of SAs in soils [68,70,108,111].…”
Section: Adsorption/desorptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Data provided by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] indicate that K d(des) ranged between 1.6 and 29.3 L kg −1 (average 6.5) for SDZ, between 3.2 and 133.9 L kg −1 (average 13.5) for SMT, and between 5.3 and 65.4 L kg −1 (average 10.9) for SCP, while the K F(des) values ranged between 0.1 and 36.8 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average 6.4) for SDZ, between 4.3 and 117.6 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 15.7) for SMT, and between 5.2 and 73.7 L n µmol 1−n kg −1 (average of 12.1) for SCP (Table 8). These values are very similar to those obtained by other authors, both for the desorption of SDZ [68,84,107,108], of SMT [109], and of SCP [70]. Furthermore, the scores reported by Conde-Cid et al [90,93] for the desorption parameters (K d(des) and K F(des) ) are considerably higher than those obtained for the adsorption parameters (K d(ads) and K F(ads) ), indicating the presence of positive hysteresis, confirmed by the HI parameter, with values higher than 1 in many cases (Table 8), which means that part of the adsorbed antibiotic was retained in the soil after a desorption cycle [110], in accordance with what was observed by other authors who also studied the adsorption and desorption process of SAs in soils [68,70,108,111].…”
Section: Adsorption/desorptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Vieira et al [70] found for their soils that the K F(ads) parameter was positively correlated with the OC and clay contents, as well as with eCEC and negatively correlated with the sand content. Finally, Doretto and Rath [108] studied soils in which the K F(ads) parameter for SDZ was positively and significantly correlated with the OC and clay contents, and significantly and negatively correlated with the sand content.…”
Section: Sulfonamide Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have described the antimicrobial and antiparasitic behaviour of TBZ in the soil (RATH et al, 2016;DORETTO et al 2014;DIONISIO;VIEIRA et al 2017). The sorption of TBZ has been investigated using four different soils commonly found in São Paulo State (OLIVEIRA NETO et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%