2019
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2019.1631654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption of Acid Black 1 dye onto bentonite – equilibrium and kinetic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption of dye on a granular (Hadi et al, 2010 ) and a lignocellulosic waste biomass (Nethaji & Sivasamy, 2011 ) activated carbons has been measured, ranging between 400–450 and 2.4–4.0 mg dye/g adsorbent, respectively. Experimental adsorption capacities of a compost (Kyzioł-Komosińska et al, 2011 ) 0.018–12.74 mg g −1 , of peat (Sepúlveda et al, 2004 ) 25 mg g −1 , of fly ash (Sun et al, 2010 ) 35 mg g −1 , and of bentonite (Pająk et al, 2019 ) 31.29 mg g −1 , have been determined. Values for the dye retention by mesoporous carbons have been reported as 270 (Galán et al, 2013 ) and 271.39–497.93 mg g −1 (Peng et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption of dye on a granular (Hadi et al, 2010 ) and a lignocellulosic waste biomass (Nethaji & Sivasamy, 2011 ) activated carbons has been measured, ranging between 400–450 and 2.4–4.0 mg dye/g adsorbent, respectively. Experimental adsorption capacities of a compost (Kyzioł-Komosińska et al, 2011 ) 0.018–12.74 mg g −1 , of peat (Sepúlveda et al, 2004 ) 25 mg g −1 , of fly ash (Sun et al, 2010 ) 35 mg g −1 , and of bentonite (Pająk et al, 2019 ) 31.29 mg g −1 , have been determined. Values for the dye retention by mesoporous carbons have been reported as 270 (Galán et al, 2013 ) and 271.39–497.93 mg g −1 (Peng et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraparticle diffusion (IPD) models were used to investigate the rate limiting mechanism of HSsorption on bentonite. While the sorption kinetics in these experiments are complicated because of various consecutive processes, e.g., film/external diffusion, intraparticle diffusion, surface interaction by physisorption or chemisorption (Can, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2017;Sahoo and Prelot, 2020;González-lópez et al, 2022), these simplified kinetic models are commonly used to initially understand sorption processes in various contextsincluding bentonite sorption studies (Galambos et al, 201 ;Gomdje et al, 201 ;Dada et al, 2019;Pająk et al, 2019). Figure 3 and Table 2 presents the key results from comparing the non-linear plots of the applied kinetic models, as many recent studies recommend non-linear methods provide improved insight and reduced method bias than linearized methods (Zafar et al, 2015;Simonin, 2016;Nguyen et al, 2017;Moussout et al, 2018;Bujdák, 2020;Revellame et al, 2020;González-lópez et al, 2022).…”
Section: Sorption Kinetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%