1992
DOI: 10.1295/polymj.24.443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption, Dilation, and Isothermal Glass Transition of Poly(ethyl methacrylate)-Organic Gas Systems

Abstract: Sorption of ethylene, ethane, and propane into poly(ethyl methacrylate) and the concomitant dilation of the polymer are measured at !SoC. Each sorption isotherm has a reverse-sigmoid shape described by the extended dual-mode sorption model, and dilation isotherms are similar in shape to the corresponding sorption isotherms. Inflection on the isotherms is due to isothermal glass transition induced by the sorbed gases, whose concentration is the glass transition concentration c •. The c. value for propane is in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Henry's law (i.e., low concentration) region, Equation 1 becomes The Henry's coefficients for the dissolution ( K D ) and hole‐filling domains ( b Q ), as well as the affinity coefficient for the hole‐filling domain ( b ), each correlate with the octanol—water partition coefficient K ow (Eqns. 9–11; values in parentheses represent the standard error), consistent with solvophobic effects as an important driving force for sorption in each domain. Note that the K ow values were obtained from Schwarzenbach et al [15]: One can see by inspection of Equations 9 and 10 and the ratio bQ/K D given in Table 1 that solid‐phase dissolution is intrinsically much weaker than hole‐filling in all cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Henry's law (i.e., low concentration) region, Equation 1 becomes The Henry's coefficients for the dissolution ( K D ) and hole‐filling domains ( b Q ), as well as the affinity coefficient for the hole‐filling domain ( b ), each correlate with the octanol—water partition coefficient K ow (Eqns. 9–11; values in parentheses represent the standard error), consistent with solvophobic effects as an important driving force for sorption in each domain. Note that the K ow values were obtained from Schwarzenbach et al [15]: One can see by inspection of Equations 9 and 10 and the ratio bQ/K D given in Table 1 that solid‐phase dissolution is intrinsically much weaker than hole‐filling in all cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This particle configuration was observed for two similar polymeric sorbents, XAD-2 and XAD-4 (Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA, USA) [7]. Based on classical polymer theory [8][9][10][11][12], the glassy polymer is a Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, prior work by this author and others has shown that organic solvents can increase the sorption-desorption kinetics of HOCs on soils and sediments [11,13], thus implying that solvents change the NOM character in some way that facilitates HOC exchange. Recent work on the effect of the cosolvent methanol on sorption isotherm linearity was consistent with the NOM rubbery/glassy polymer conceptualization [18], i.e., the presence of methanol in NOM increased isotherm linearity as solvents do in synthetic polymers [19,20]. So some evidence exists that cosolvents can affect the sorptive character of NOM.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Partial molar volume of C02 in different polymers; references are literature values(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%