2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption and filtration of Hg(II) ions from aqueous solutions with a membrane containing poly(ethyleneimine) as a complexing polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many sources of mercury pollution including natural processes such as volcanoes and flooding of river basins, industrial activity such as gaseous emissions of fossil fuel combustion, and industrial processes including chloralkali production, paint, pulp, fertilizer, pharmaceutical, rubber and paper industries, oil refineries and municipal solid waste treatment [14][15][16]. Commonly accepted methods for the removal of mercury from wastewater include sulfide and chelate precipitation, iron and aluminum coagulation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane filtration, electrodeposition, activated carbon adsorption, bioadsorption and photoreduction [17][18][19]. Among them, the adsorption using solid porous materials as adsorbents is considered as the most reliable, simple, efficient and cost-effective method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many sources of mercury pollution including natural processes such as volcanoes and flooding of river basins, industrial activity such as gaseous emissions of fossil fuel combustion, and industrial processes including chloralkali production, paint, pulp, fertilizer, pharmaceutical, rubber and paper industries, oil refineries and municipal solid waste treatment [14][15][16]. Commonly accepted methods for the removal of mercury from wastewater include sulfide and chelate precipitation, iron and aluminum coagulation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane filtration, electrodeposition, activated carbon adsorption, bioadsorption and photoreduction [17][18][19]. Among them, the adsorption using solid porous materials as adsorbents is considered as the most reliable, simple, efficient and cost-effective method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desorption of metal ions is typically performed in concentrated nitric acid. However, as nitric acid is an oxidizing reagent and the membrane may be degraded, some researches choose EDTA, a potent complexing agent, for desorption of metal ions [23,25]. Desorption of metal ions from the PVA doped PEI nanofibrous membranes was carried out in 0.05 M EDTA, 0.05 M HCl, and 0.05 M HNO 3 solution, respectively.…”
Section: Regeneration Of the Pva Doped Pei Nanofibrous Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEI has high affinity for various metal ions and can be used as a chelating agent for the removal of heavy metal cations present in wastewater [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and the interactions between metal ions and polymers in solutions have been reviewed [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for an efficient and cheaper method for metal ion removal leads to the development of polymer sorbents, which can form complexes with metal ions. In recent years, several such sorbents were developed and used in the recovery of metal ions present in aqueous solutions . The main advantages of these adsorbents are the easy loading, desorption of ions using simple chemicals and reusability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%