2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorbent extraction of rubeanic acid–metal chelates on a new adsorbent: Sepabeads SP70

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed procedure is superior to reported methods of heavy metal for preconcentration-separation in terms of no need of consumption of organic solvents and enrichment factor. The method is relatively rapid as compared with previously reported procedures for the enrichment of heavy metal ions [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed procedure is superior to reported methods of heavy metal for preconcentration-separation in terms of no need of consumption of organic solvents and enrichment factor. The method is relatively rapid as compared with previously reported procedures for the enrichment of heavy metal ions [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33][34][35][36] In order to investigate the optimum amount of ligand on the quantitative extraction of these ions by the γ-alumina, the ion extraction was conducted upon varying the amount of ligand from 0 to 70 mg. The recovery of analyte ions without ligand was not quantitative.…”
Section: Effect Of Ligand Amountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of ligand on the preconcentration studies is also another main factor [16,[30][31][32][33][34]. In order to investigate the optimum amount of ligand on the quantitative extraction of these ions by the activated carbon, these ions extraction was conducted by varying the amount of ligand from 0 to 60 mg.…”
Section: Effect Of Ligand Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has several advantages over other techniques, including stability and reusability of the solid phase, reach of high preconcentration factors, easiness of separation and enrichment under dynamic conditions, no need for organic solvents and minimal costs due to low consumption of reagents. Several selective solid phase extractors have been prepared either by physical loading or chemical binding of selected chelating reagents to different solid supports such as silica gel [8,9], activated carbon, [10,11], SDS-coated alumina [12], modified chromosorb [13], ion-imprinted polymers [14], Amberlite XAD-2000 resin [15] and Sepabeads SP70 [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%