2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soot particle size distributions in a well-stirred reactor/plug flow reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference of the PSD by considering the aggregate structures would be attributed to the ''collector.' ' Bhatt and Lindstedt (2009) applied the sectional method considering the fractal dimension to the geometry on soot formation experimentally investigated by Manzello et al (2007), where the number concentration was approximately 10 10 cm -3 . They concluded that the sensitivity to variations in the fractal dimension was not significant under the set of conditions.…”
Section: Comparison To Sectional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference of the PSD by considering the aggregate structures would be attributed to the ''collector.' ' Bhatt and Lindstedt (2009) applied the sectional method considering the fractal dimension to the geometry on soot formation experimentally investigated by Manzello et al (2007), where the number concentration was approximately 10 10 cm -3 . They concluded that the sensitivity to variations in the fractal dimension was not significant under the set of conditions.…”
Section: Comparison To Sectional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the sensitivity to variations in the fractal dimension was not significant under the set of conditions. If the aggregate structures were not evolved with low number concentrations (Abid et al 2008;Manzello et al 2007), considering the aggregate structures are not required for calculating the PSDs with the sectional method. However, for direct simulation using the AMP-CCA model, it is necessary to calculate the actual PSD for cases with high number concentrations, such as carbon black (Balthasar et al 2002).…”
Section: Comparison To Sectional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent works use measured size and mass distributions of inception particles produced in flames [2,[4][5][6][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] or flow reactors [26,27] to examine particle formation and evolution in combustion processes. All of these works necessarily use an intrusive probe to quickly dilute sampled flame products in an attempt to quench particle coagulation/reaction in the sample line and to measure the ''in flame" PSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 LII has been applied for soot diagnostics in several practical devices: diesel engines, gas turbines, shock tubes, rocket engine and others. [20][21][22] As other optical techniques, LII only requires a free spectral access to the region of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second harmonic of the Nd:YAG laser, at 532 nm, promotes the undesirable fluorescence of large PAHs, which consists in the most interference of the LII signal, while the emission at 1064 nm excites only the soot particles. 19,21 LII wavelength detection also have to take account spectral interferences derived of the natural flame emissions and light scattering effects. 20 Finally, the typical time-life of LII signal is ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%