2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soot in the arctic snowpack: a cause for perturbations in radiative transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
232
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
232
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other common light-absorbing particles in the atmosphere (Clarke and Noone 1985;Warren and Clarke 1990), dust trapped in snow or glacier ice will not only decrease the sensitivity of the instrument ) but also bias the WIOC/EC split point during the analysis as demonstrated in this study. This bias is especially prevalent in samples containing obvious dust particles because the dust content may be several orders of magnitude higher than EC, while the absorption coefficient is 2 or 3 times of magnitude smaller (Warren and Clarke 1990;Hansen et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As with other common light-absorbing particles in the atmosphere (Clarke and Noone 1985;Warren and Clarke 1990), dust trapped in snow or glacier ice will not only decrease the sensitivity of the instrument ) but also bias the WIOC/EC split point during the analysis as demonstrated in this study. This bias is especially prevalent in samples containing obvious dust particles because the dust content may be several orders of magnitude higher than EC, while the absorption coefficient is 2 or 3 times of magnitude smaller (Warren and Clarke 1990;Hansen et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, once deposited to snow or ice, BC and OC absorb radiation within the snowpack, and cause an earlier snow disappearance or decrease the snow mass, inducing a positive forcing at the surface, through decreased albedo (e.g. Warren and Wiscombe, 1980;Clarke and Noone, 1985;Jacobson, 2004;Hadley and Kirchstetter, 2012). Overall, Shindell and Faluvegi (2009) and Shindell (2012) pointed out that the temperature response to a radiative forcing is not necessarily correlated with the location of this radiative forcing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation impact of this aerosol is still poorly understood. Moreover, the Arctic environment is very vulnerable during that season, as aerosol deposition on snow or ice covered surfaces reduces the albedo and favors an earlier onset of the melting season (Flanner et al, 2007;Clarke and Noone, 2007;Stroeve et al, 2007). The direct forcing of aerosol depends, among other factors, on its soot content (Stone et al, 2008;Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008) and surface albedo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%