2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soot aggregate morphology in coflow laminar ethylene diffusion flames at elevated pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…̅̅̅ increases with pressure up to 4 atm and changing pressure from 4 to 5 atm, does not change ̅̅̅ significantly. These trends are consistent with the ones obtained from ethylene flames (Gigone et al, 2019, Steinmetz et al, 2016 but contradicts with the pressurized flames of methane (Vargas and Gülder, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…̅̅̅ increases with pressure up to 4 atm and changing pressure from 4 to 5 atm, does not change ̅̅̅ significantly. These trends are consistent with the ones obtained from ethylene flames (Gigone et al, 2019, Steinmetz et al, 2016 but contradicts with the pressurized flames of methane (Vargas and Gülder, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The average diameter of primary particles along the flame wing is larger than those along the flame centerline, which is different from the distributions of particle number density, as described in our previous work. 3 In addition, the average diameter ranges from 15 to 65 nm for most particles, which is similar to the measured results of Gigone et al 17 by transmission electron microscopy observations. An increase in overall particle sizes with the increase of pressure is displayed, and the average diameters of the particles in the wing of the flame increase faster than those in the centerline, similar to the trend of Steinmetz et al 18 According to Choi et al, 45 the density of solid soot particles is assumed to be 1.8 g/cm 3 in the present work, and the primary particle is assumed be spherical, hence the primary diameter is only concerned with its mass.…”
Section: Effects Of Pressure Onsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…11 Nevertheless, the ambient pressure of in-cylinder combustion is much higher, which has significant effects on the overall soot yield as well as the rates of soot reactions. 16 Gigone et al 17 measured the particle morphological characteristics in a laminar ethylene flame at elevated pressures, and the results showed that the average diameter of primary soot particle, particle number density, and fractal dimension increase with increasing pressure. Steinmetz et al 18 investigated the particle size in laminar ethylene coflow flames at elevated pressures by laser scattering, and found that the particle sizes in the flame wing rise faster than those along the centerline with the increase of pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this post-flame zone, soot particles are largely oxidized by the excess air. This might explain why the diameter of primary soot particles emitted by commercial aircraft engines is found relatively small around 15-16 nm on a large range of engine thrusts [34,35] by contrast to the much larger diameter of soot particles sampled in the sooting zone of high pressure combustors [36]. In the next section, we evaluate whether the exposure of soot particles to OH radicals, present between the combustor and the exit of an aeronautic engine, could be high enough to make them sufficiently active to become CCNs.…”
Section: Comparison Between Kerosene and Diesel Sootmentioning
confidence: 99%