2017
DOI: 10.54013/kk719a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soome-Eesti keelesild XXI sajandil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some politicians have argued that due to a missing national transit policy, a significant part of potential delivery capacities were transferred to Finland and Latvia (see Korb, 2016). This statement stems from a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2014, stressing that based on the World Bank's logistics performance index, Estonia does not have significant qualitative advantages vis-à-vis Latvia and Finland, as far as the main logistics components such as customs, infrastructure, international shipments, logistics competence, tracking and tracing, and timeliness are concerned (Tender & Kalmer, 2014). Another study of PricewaterhouseCoopers (2017) states that Estonia has lost trade volume while at the same time, its neighbouring countries have benefited from an increase in global trade volumes and that the competitiveness of Estonia as a transit corridor is relatively weak due to high prices (see Logistika et al, 2017).…”
Section: Trends In Economic Transit In Estonia In 1990 -2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, some politicians have argued that due to a missing national transit policy, a significant part of potential delivery capacities were transferred to Finland and Latvia (see Korb, 2016). This statement stems from a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2014, stressing that based on the World Bank's logistics performance index, Estonia does not have significant qualitative advantages vis-à-vis Latvia and Finland, as far as the main logistics components such as customs, infrastructure, international shipments, logistics competence, tracking and tracing, and timeliness are concerned (Tender & Kalmer, 2014). Another study of PricewaterhouseCoopers (2017) states that Estonia has lost trade volume while at the same time, its neighbouring countries have benefited from an increase in global trade volumes and that the competitiveness of Estonia as a transit corridor is relatively weak due to high prices (see Logistika et al, 2017).…”
Section: Trends In Economic Transit In Estonia In 1990 -2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative survey was conducted among Estonian companies operating in the economic transit sector and among the local policy experts. The dynamics of economic transit flows in Estonia has been investigated in several other studies, like Pukk (2011), Pukk et al (2014), Tender and Kalmer (2014) or Lend et al (2008); however, the current study differs from these studies in its systematic approach to all potential factors that could have affected Estonia's economic transit in various periods. Next to that, other studies do not include any qualitative surveys about the views of local entrepreneurs and policy analysts on that matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%