1988
DOI: 10.1086/228953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sons, Daughters, and the Risk of Marital Disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
225
4
10

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
225
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between family type and sex is not signi®cant; there are not more girls in families after a divorce than in other family types. This does not con®rm the results of the study by Morgan et al [51] who found that parents of girls tend to divorce slightly more often than those of boys. After a divorce, adolescents usually remain with the mother: of one-parent families after a divorce 91% consists of families with only a mother and 9% of families with only a father.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between family type and sex is not signi®cant; there are not more girls in families after a divorce than in other family types. This does not con®rm the results of the study by Morgan et al [51] who found that parents of girls tend to divorce slightly more often than those of boys. After a divorce, adolescents usually remain with the mother: of one-parent families after a divorce 91% consists of families with only a mother and 9% of families with only a father.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Another well-documented effect of a first-born girl vs. first-born boy is reduced marital stability, a fact first noted by Morgan, Lye, and Condran (1988). 20 Therefore, the gender of one's first child may affect labor supply late in the working life via marital history.…”
Section: Addressing IV Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative relationship between union dissolution and investments in a relationship via things such as time spent in union, children, and home ownership has been explained as resulting from the greater costs incurred by exiting a union with more of these investments [9] [11] [12] [14] [15] [16] [17]. Additionally, the sometimes found positive relationship between a couple having a boy and union stability has been viewed as reflecting the greater costs for fathers to leave unions in which they have put more time and energy into due to their greater involvement with a male child vis-à-vis a female child [18] [19] [20]. At the same time, the sometimes positive relationship which has been found between a wife's income and union stability has been deemed as resulting from the reduced benefit of exiting a relationship in which a wife's income, if pooled, has benefited the entire family and relieved the economic pressure on the husband [8] [21].…”
Section: How To Cite This Paper: Mastroniani a (2017) An Exploratiomentioning
confidence: 99%