2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonoporation by Single-Shot Pulsed Ultrasound with Microbubbles Adjacent to Cells

Abstract: In this article, membrane perforation of endothelial cells with attached microbubbles caused by exposure to single-shot short pulsed ultrasound is described, and the mechanisms of membrane damage and repair are discussed. Real-time optical observations of cell-bubble interaction during sonoporation and successive scanning electron microscope observations of the membrane damage with knowledge of bubble locations revealed production of micron-sized membrane perforations at the bubble locations. High-speed observ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
167
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our set-up, ultrasound was applied based on a single-shot pulsing protocol similar to that adopted in other cellular-level studies on sonoporation [13]. The applied pulse was a 30-cycle tone burst with 1 MHz wave frequency (i.e.…”
Section: Ultrasound Exposure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our set-up, ultrasound was applied based on a single-shot pulsing protocol similar to that adopted in other cellular-level studies on sonoporation [13]. The applied pulse was a 30-cycle tone burst with 1 MHz wave frequency (i.e.…”
Section: Ultrasound Exposure Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fostering localized induction of sonoporation, one technical advance that has played an important role is the advent of targeted microbubbles with binding affinity to antigen receptors on the cell type of interest [8,9], such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors expressed on cancerous cells [10] or hypoxic endothelial cells [11]. These targeted microbubbles, often composed of a perfluorocarbon gas core encapsulated within an antibody-conjugated shell material [12], are in effect artificial gas bodies that would cavitate in response to ultrasound excitation, which could be as short as a single pulse firing [13]. As their binding is known to persist under shear-flow conditions [14,15], they can effectively reside adjacent to the plasma membrane to locally induce membrane disruption over their course of acoustic cavitation [16,17] and concurrently release drugs which may be preloaded onto the microbubble shell [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By voltage clamp techniques, an increase in transmembrane current simultaneously with ultrasound application was reported, indicating ion flux through pores [10]. Moreover, several papers demonstrated the uptake of cell-impermeable molecules when exposing cells to ultrasound [11][12][13]. However, more recently, Meijering et al [14] stated that besides pore formation, enhanced endocytosis also contributes to ultrasound mediated delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that sonoporation induces a temporal increase in cell membrane permeability by exposure to single-shot short-pulsed ultrasound with a microbubble adjacent to a cell [1][2][3][4]. This is a promising technique for safe sonoporation in vivo because short-pulsed ultrasound, which is mainly used for diagnostic ultrasound, is safer than continuous-wave or long-burst ultrasound, which is mainly used for ultrasound therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%