1995
DOI: 10.1021/j100039a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonoluminescence from Single Bubbles in Nonaqueous Liquids: New Parameter Space for Sonochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference with the Weninger et al (1995) experiment in pure alcohols thus lies in the solubility of the chemical reaction products in the surrounding liquid, which is still almost pure water in the case of alcohol contamination experiments. Didenko et al (2000b) therefore sought ideal nonaqueous liquids for SBSL, requiring (i) a low vapor pressure to limit vapor invasion of the bubble and (ii) a high content of O or N heteroatoms to facilitate the chemical formation of species upon collapse that will readily dissolve in or react with the liquid phase.…”
Section: F Other Liquids and Contaminated Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference with the Weninger et al (1995) experiment in pure alcohols thus lies in the solubility of the chemical reaction products in the surrounding liquid, which is still almost pure water in the case of alcohol contamination experiments. Didenko et al (2000b) therefore sought ideal nonaqueous liquids for SBSL, requiring (i) a low vapor pressure to limit vapor invasion of the bubble and (ii) a high content of O or N heteroatoms to facilitate the chemical formation of species upon collapse that will readily dissolve in or react with the liquid phase.…”
Section: F Other Liquids and Contaminated Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While dissolved salts (Matula et al, 1995) or mixtures of water and freely miscible liquids do not prohibit stable SBSL, for years it could not be observed in other liquids, even though multibubble sonoluminescence in nonaqueous liquids had been known for a long time (see, for example, Suslick and Flint, 1987). Weninger et al (1995) showed that weakly emitting, unstable single sonoluminescing bubbles could be observed in pure alcohols, while the light of a stable SBSL bubble in water could be turned off by just adding a few drops of alcohol to the solution. The latter effect can be understood by recognizing that alcohols are surface active and tend to accumulate at the bubble surface.…”
Section: F Other Liquids and Contaminated Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Due to the lack of features in the SBSL spectra of water, SBSL in other liquids could lead to valuable insights into the physical and chemical processes occurring during singlebubble cavitation. In fact, SBSL spectra from organic liquids 8,9 have been previously reported. Most recently, we have found concentrated sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) to be an extremely interesting and effective liquid for the study of SBSL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two experimental configurations for SL exist: multibubble sonoluminescence (MBSL) [1,2], which occurs in transient cavitation clouds, and single bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL), which occurs when a single bubble is trapped at the node of an applied acoustic field [3,4]. Recent experiments [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] uncovered many remarkable properties of SBSL, including picosecond light pulses [4,11] and sensitive dependences on almost all experimental parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To wit: While the shock theory is believed to work for both MBSL [13] and SBSL [14], the entire MBSL bubble cloud emits less than 1% of the light of a single bubble in SBSL. For SBSL in alcohols, Weninger et al [9] reported the existence of abrupt jumps in the light intensity, in which the light output changes by a factor of 400 with a 1 ± C change in the liquid temperature. More recently, Weninger et al [10] reported the existence of angular correlations in the light output, in which the radiation field had a significant dipole moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%