1985
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.144.6.1235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonography vs. excretory urography in acute flank pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hill in the evaluation of acute flank pain felt that a KUB in addition to the US exam would increase the sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating for renal obstruction. All four cases of missed obstructing stones were evident on the plain film in his series [4]. Haddads work also suggested the KUB was helpful in identifying the level of obstruction and the size of the obstructing stone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hill in the evaluation of acute flank pain felt that a KUB in addition to the US exam would increase the sensitivity and accuracy in evaluating for renal obstruction. All four cases of missed obstructing stones were evident on the plain film in his series [4]. Haddads work also suggested the KUB was helpful in identifying the level of obstruction and the size of the obstructing stone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…10 But both IVU and sonography have limitations in determining the functional significance and degree of obstructions and the cause of hydronephrosis. 3,4,11,22,30,31 We found hydronephrosis in 64% of patients (18 patients) with grayscale sonography. The sensitivity and specificity of this modality for renal obstruction were 64% and 100%, respectively; the sensitivity value is lower than that in other reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The advantages of IVU are visualization of both radiopaque and radiolucent stones [1, 6, 15, 30], visualization of the urinary tract itself [35], and demonstration of obstruction [3, 14, 30, 35] as well as function of both kidneys [3, 14, 35]. However, its disadvantages are also quite obvious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the fear of the potential hazards of either ionizing radiation or injected contrast media has led investigators to evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) as a safe method of triage before considering IVU [8, 9]. Although many of the recent studies concluded that US alone or in combination with a plain abdominal film of the kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) could replace IVU when the working diagnosis was urinary stones in patients with acute flank pain [6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15], other investigators consider IVU an indispensable procedure in their proposed diagnostic algorithms [6, 10]. Only a few studies have paid attention to the diagnostic values of clinical or laboratory findings that might accompany urinary lithiasis, although they would give a clue to the diagnosis if they were considered [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%