The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1999
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.6.10584808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonography compared with radiography in revealing acute rib fracture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
121
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
121
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At US, rib injuries may display a disruption of the normally continuous echogenic cortex of the rib, disruption of the costochondral junction, or fracture of the costal cartilage. 3 In a study by Griffith et al US detected 10 times as many fractures in 6 times as many patients as radiography and 11% of those fractures were located in the costal cartilage or at the costochondral junction. 3 Turk et al diagnosed rib fractures by US in 18/20 patients who had negative radiography, but continuing pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At US, rib injuries may display a disruption of the normally continuous echogenic cortex of the rib, disruption of the costochondral junction, or fracture of the costal cartilage. 3 In a study by Griffith et al US detected 10 times as many fractures in 6 times as many patients as radiography and 11% of those fractures were located in the costal cartilage or at the costochondral junction. 3 Turk et al diagnosed rib fractures by US in 18/20 patients who had negative radiography, but continuing pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3 In a study by Griffith et al US detected 10 times as many fractures in 6 times as many patients as radiography and 11% of those fractures were located in the costal cartilage or at the costochondral junction. 3 Turk et al diagnosed rib fractures by US in 18/20 patients who had negative radiography, but continuing pain. Their study showed that US had a sensitivity of 78% compared to 12% for radiography in the detection of rib fractures, including costal cartilage fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Griffith et al revealed in their study of 50 patients a sensitivity of 90 % for the detection of rib fractures, while radiography showed only a sensitivity of 15 %. The specificity of both modalities was 100 % [14]. On the other hand, ultrasonography has known limitations such as high examiner and patient dependence, and missing standards to perform and document the examinations.…”
Section: Abb 1 64-jähriger Patient Mit Frakturen Der Rippen Vu-ix (☆mentioning
confidence: 99%