2017
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.16.03005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic Evaluation of Fetal Adrenal Gland in Gestational Diabetes

Abstract: An enlargement of the fetal adrenal gland may be observed in gestational diabetes, not only related to birth weight, but also to distinctive features of diabetic pregnancies, such as fat tissue fetal deposits or maternal biochemical markers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the HbA1c is widely used and assessed by the WHO indicator, it is usually measured in the combination of insulin C-peptide and glucose levels [17]. Therefore, its predictive and diagnostic value as a sole indicator on the surface seems unlikely.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits for assessment and precise monitoring of fetal growth is some kind specific compare to ultrasound examination, but unfortunately, this diagnostic strategy did not demonstrate more sensitive results to predict macrosomia [18].The primary place for DF diagnosis is occupied by ultrasound examination during pregnancy [12,19]. However, the signs of DF cannot be reliably detected in the first trimester, despite recommendations to conduct such studies between 10-14 weeks of gestational age [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the HbA1c is widely used and assessed by the WHO indicator, it is usually measured in the combination of insulin C-peptide and glucose levels [17]. Therefore, its predictive and diagnostic value as a sole indicator on the surface seems unlikely.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits for assessment and precise monitoring of fetal growth is some kind specific compare to ultrasound examination, but unfortunately, this diagnostic strategy did not demonstrate more sensitive results to predict macrosomia [18].The primary place for DF diagnosis is occupied by ultrasound examination during pregnancy [12,19]. However, the signs of DF cannot be reliably detected in the first trimester, despite recommendations to conduct such studies between 10-14 weeks of gestational age [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, its predictive and diagnostic value as a sole indicator on the surface seems unlikely.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits for assessment and precise monitoring of fetal growth is some kind specific compare to ultrasound examination, but unfortunately, this diagnostic strategy did not demonstrate more sensitive results to predict macrosomia [18].The primary place for DF diagnosis is occupied by ultrasound examination during pregnancy [12,19]. However, the signs of DF cannot be reliably detected in the first trimester, despite recommendations to conduct such studies between 10-14 weeks of gestational age [19]. The DF can be asymptomatic even after ultrasound examination and biochemical tests up to 30 weeks of gestation, whereas from the 31st week there may be a surge in the size of fetus, accompanied by glycemic indicators at the lower limits [8,11,12,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations