2012
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.21971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic assessment of acute changes in plaque size and echogenicity and in intima‐media thickness of carotid arteries after neck radiation therapy

Abstract: Radiation in the acute phase not only increases the IMT but also causes new plaque formation and changes in plaque size and echogenicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with the study of Fokkema et al in which they used MRI and found that radiation-induced carotid lesions were less inflammatory with more fibrosis tissue (38,39). Toprak's groups found the soft and dense present plaques turned calcified after receiving radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients (40). Similar studies also reported that microcalcifications(41), cardiovascular calcifications (42), calcification in basal ganglia 43 Values are mean ± SEM † N = total number of subject in the corresponding analysis; n = total number of carotid plaque in the corresponding analysis P T =Comparison between total post-RT NPC subjects and CVRF subjects.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Carotid Plaque Componentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The results are consistent with the study of Fokkema et al in which they used MRI and found that radiation-induced carotid lesions were less inflammatory with more fibrosis tissue (38,39). Toprak's groups found the soft and dense present plaques turned calcified after receiving radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients (40). Similar studies also reported that microcalcifications(41), cardiovascular calcifications (42), calcification in basal ganglia 43 Values are mean ± SEM † N = total number of subject in the corresponding analysis; n = total number of carotid plaque in the corresponding analysis P T =Comparison between total post-RT NPC subjects and CVRF subjects.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Carotid Plaque Componentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Nevertheless, in their studied population the presence of hypertension was significantly greater in the group with atheromas (60% vs. 30.4%) and all patients were evaluated before undergoing RT. Toprak et al (2012) also found that the presence of risk factors did not influence significantly IMT of carotid arteries after RT (20). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have suggested that the direct effect of RT to the carotid arteries is able to induce/accelerate atherosclerosis (16,20-22). In the current research, most of the patients with CCAA in their panoramic radiograph after RT also presented this alteration before treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toprak et al performed 50 sonographic evaluations on patients pre-and postradiation therapy. 16 They concluded that radiation caused new plaque formation and increase in the size of pre-existing plaques. 16 Cheng et al performed a prospective study on the effects of radiation on carotid stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 They concluded that radiation caused new plaque formation and increase in the size of pre-existing plaques. 16 Cheng et al performed a prospective study on the effects of radiation on carotid stenosis. 17 They found an annual progression rate from less than 50% to 50% or greater stenosis in 14.5% of irradiated arteries compared with only 4.8% on nonirradiated arteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%