2011
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in children

Abstract: In the majority of the children, the appendix can be visualized with US. Age, weight, and height affect the visualization rate of the normal appendix.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terms reflective of patient demographics (age, gender, height and weight) were not included in the model as prior sonographic studies have shown no diameter dependence on these variables [12,13]. The proposed 3-category interpretive scheme was defined based on the shape of the predictive curve generated by the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terms reflective of patient demographics (age, gender, height and weight) were not included in the model as prior sonographic studies have shown no diameter dependence on these variables [12,13]. The proposed 3-category interpretive scheme was defined based on the shape of the predictive curve generated by the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perforated appendix can decompress and lose its integrity such that it cannot be reliably identified. US visualization of the normal appendix can also be difficult, with reported rates ranging from 2.4% to 86.2% [8][9][10][11][12][13]. The diagnosis of perforated appendicitis can be particularly challenging when the appendix is not visualized, which can occur in the setting of both perforated appendicitis and a normal appendix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A normal appendix should measure 6 mm or less in diameter from outside wall to outside wall. It should have a thin wall (less than 3 mm), be empty or gas/faecal-filled and compressible, and there should be no evidence of hypervascularisation [2326].
Fig.
…”
Section: Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are varying rates quoted in the literature for the appendix being seen, between 24.4 % and 69.3 % [6, 13, 23]. In this situation, it is important to actively assess for the secondary features often seen which may help direct further management.…”
Section: Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%