1988
DOI: 10.1159/000473432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonographic Appearance of Benign Intratesticular Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high sensitivity of US for detecting malignancy has always provided much reassurance for the clinician, despite the mediocre specificity [6,7]. Although there are reports of success in the discrimination of benign from malignant testicular lesions, most consider that US is very limited in this specific regard [8–10]. In the many cases where the nature of the lesion cannot be reliably predicted by US alone, FSA has allowed an accurate diagnosis and prevented unnecessary orchidectomy in a significant percentage of patients [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high sensitivity of US for detecting malignancy has always provided much reassurance for the clinician, despite the mediocre specificity [6,7]. Although there are reports of success in the discrimination of benign from malignant testicular lesions, most consider that US is very limited in this specific regard [8–10]. In the many cases where the nature of the lesion cannot be reliably predicted by US alone, FSA has allowed an accurate diagnosis and prevented unnecessary orchidectomy in a significant percentage of patients [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemangioma usually presents as palpable a lesion with testicular enlargement, with or without tenderness [1,2,12,13]. On gray-scale sonography, it appears as a well defined, hypo-echoic [2,6,19] or hyperechoic lesion [14], homogeneous or inhomogeneous due to fibrosis or presence of calcifications of variable size. [3,6,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,7,16 The differential diagnosis of a scrotal swelling includes testicular tumors, acute infections, infarction, granulomatous orchitis, and tuberculous epididymo-orchitis. 2,[26][27][28] The presence of epididymal involvement in conjunction with a testicular lesion is suggestive of an infection rather than a tumor, because orchitis is nearly always caused by epididymitis, while even advanced testicular tumors may only partially involve the epididymis. Sometimes the epididymides may be enlarged because of coincidental epididymitis or direct tumor invasion-especially in lymphoma, but also in germ cell tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%