The Behavior, Ecology and Evolution of Cichlid Fishes 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-2080-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sonic Cichlids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Auditory communication has been examined primarily in the context of the physiological mechanisms underlying hearing and sound production, a logical trend given the long and successful history of morphological comparative studies in cichlids. Swimbladder and ear morphology have been compared within cichlids and in comparison to non-cichlids (Braun and Grande 2008;Schulz-Mirbach et al 2012;Ladich 2016) and behavioural studies have demonstrated the role of auditory communication among cichlids, for example during courtship displays (see Lobel et al 2021). In Oreochromis mossambicus both male-male contests and malefemale courtship are accompanied by sound production (Amorim et al 2003).…”
Section: Communication Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory communication has been examined primarily in the context of the physiological mechanisms underlying hearing and sound production, a logical trend given the long and successful history of morphological comparative studies in cichlids. Swimbladder and ear morphology have been compared within cichlids and in comparison to non-cichlids (Braun and Grande 2008;Schulz-Mirbach et al 2012;Ladich 2016) and behavioural studies have demonstrated the role of auditory communication among cichlids, for example during courtship displays (see Lobel et al 2021). In Oreochromis mossambicus both male-male contests and malefemale courtship are accompanied by sound production (Amorim et al 2003).…”
Section: Communication Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applying the reduced dataset, the classification rate in LDA decreased from 86% to 69%, which is a less acceptable outcome, and it implies that interspecific discrimination becomes more difficult without certain (temporal) acoustic features, such as temperature‐dependent DUR and PRR in our case. Indeed, PRR is known to differ between closely related species, recorded at the same temperature (Lobel, 2001; Myrberg et al., 1978). Finally, the only remaining soniferous sand goby, which was previously acoustically investigated but was not included in this study, is the two‐spotted goby Pomastoschistus flavescens (Fabricius 1779; de Jong et al., 2016, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many teleost fishes, there are modifications of the bladder or cranial morphology that increase this indirect ear stimulation and increase sound detection [ 147 ]. Variation in both the inner ear and swim bladder morphology has not been studied extensively in East African cichlids and hence the scope of its diversity remains unknown [ 148 ].…”
Section: Major Interests and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%